The Mate Retention Inventory-Short Form (MRI-SF)

By David M. Buss, T. Shackelford, William F. McKibbin. 2008

176 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eaf666bbcd2f0f3dc57159fd9c0368a64255e889

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. P. Jonason
2. Norman P. Li
3. David M. Buss
4. T. Shackelford
5. Valerie G. Starratt
6. Emily J. Miner
7. Gregory D. Webster
8. J. Rauthmann

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. P. Jonason
2. David M. Buss
3. Norman P. Li
4. T. Shackelford
5. Valerie G. Starratt
6. Emily J. Miner
7. D. Schmitt
8. Gregory D. Webster

In Sociology and Political Science

1. David M. Buss
2. P. Jonason
3. T. Shackelford
4. Norman P. Li
5. Valerie G. Starratt
6. Emily J. Miner
7. D. Schmitt
8. Jon K. Maner

Citations in the corpus

• The costs and benefits of the Dark Triad : implications for mate poaching and mate retention tactics (2010, methodology): “Rates of mate retention efforts were measured with the Mate Retention Inventory-Short Form (Buss, Shackelford, & McKibbin, 2008).”
• It’s not all about her: Men’s mate value and mate retention (2009, methodology): “Participants also completed the Mate Retention Inventory – Short Form (MRI–SF; Buss, Shackelford, & McKibbin, 2008), which assesses performance of men’s mate retention behaviors.”