Exploring the ancillary benefits of the Kyoto Protocol for air pollution in Europe

By D. P. Vuuren, Janusz Cofala, H. Eerens, R. Oostenrijk, C. Heyes, Zbigniew Klimont, M. Elzen, Markus Amann. 2006

173 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Economics and Econometrics, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2e8cc818dfc38e1c158183b36f0ac7afe75fcb02

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

1. Zbigniew Klimont
2. Steven J. Smith
3. Shinichiro Fujimori

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Keywan Riahi
2. Volker Krey
3. Gunnar Luderer
4. David McCollum
5. D. V. van Vuuren
6. D. P. Vuuren
7. Arnulf Grubler
8. Bas J. van Ruijven

In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

1. D. P. Vuuren
2. Massimo Tavoni

Citations in the corpus

• Climate policies can help resolve energy security and air pollution challenges (2013, background): “Such work builds on a small, but growing, body of literature (e.g., Bollen et al. 2010; Cofala et al. 2010; McCollum et al. 2011; van Vuuren et al. 2006).”
• Future air pollution in the Shared Socio-economic Pathways (2017, background): “For example, policies addressing climate change often, as a co-benefit, reduce atmospheric emissions, thus improving ambient air quality (McCollum et al., 2013; van Vuuren et al., 2006; Bollen, 2008) .”
• Cobenefits of climate and air pollution regulations The context of the European Commission Roadmap for moving to a low carbon economy in 2050 (2012, unknown): “Many studies have highlighted the positive effects of climate policies on air pollution (ApSimon et al., 2009; EEA, 2004a; van Aardenne et al., 2010; van Vuuren et al., 2006a; van Vuuren et al., 2007; van Vuuren et al., 2006b).”
• Modeling Energy and Development: an Evaluation of Models and Concepts (2008, background): “However, if combined with climate policy (e.g. van Vuuren et al., 2006) or if renewable energy is promoted as a solution (e.g. Boudri et al., 2002), urban air pollution can benefit from other developments in the energy system that have an impact on the energy system structure.”
• Air pollution policy in Europe: Quantifying the interaction with greenhouse gases and climate change policies (2014, background): “This co-benefit from climate change policies are the ones often presented in the literature, like Criqui et al. (2003) and van Vuuren et al. (2006).”
• Climate policy co-benefits: a review (2020, background): “According to van Vuuren et al. (2006), air quality co-benefits of achieving Europe’s Kyoto Protocol targets would cover around 50% of policy costs, whereas Aaheim, Kristin, and Seip (1999) conclude health benefits of better air quality in Hungary to be large enough to cover almost 90% of the…”
• Indicators for energy security (2009, background): “As a co-benefit of climate policy, also the emissions of air pollutants are significantly reduced (see also Mayerhofer et al., 2002; van Vuuren et al., 2006).”
• Climate policy and ancillary benefits: A survey and integration into the modelling of international negotiations on climate change (2008, unknown): “Benefits associated with non-airpollution related road traffic effects are also omitted by the study by Van Vuuren et al. (2006) analysing the ancillary benefits which are due to the implementation of the Kyoto Protocol.”
• A multi-model assessment of food security implications of climate change mitigation (2019, unknown): “47 48 Acknowledgement; 49 SFu, TH, and KT are supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP16K18177, JSPS 50 Overseas Research Fellowships, and the Environment Research and Technology 51 Development Fund (2-1702) of the Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency of 52 Japan.”