Commuting, shifting or remaining?: different spatial utilisation patterns of wild boar Sus scrofa L. in forest and field crops during summer.
By O. Keuling, N. Stier, M. Roth. 2009
130 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2e85a239124ffc19fc15cab96ea3807f3c60bd3c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- B. Jędrzejewska
- O. Keuling
- W. Jędrzejewski
- N. Stier
- M. Roth
- Tomasz Podgórski
- L. Sönnichsen
- H. Okarma
Citations in the corpus
- How does hunting influence activity and spatial usage in wild boar Sus scrofa L.? (2008, background): “In summer, many wild boar groups live predominantly within fields, causing high damages (Gerard et al. 1991; Cahill et al. 2003; Keuling et al. 2008b, 2009).”
- Towards understanding wild boar Sus scrofa movement: a synthetic movement ecology approach (2014, unknown): “2008a) and from year to year (Keuling et al. 2009).”
- Spatiotemporal behavioral plasticity of wild boar (Sus scrofa) under contrasting conditions of human pressure: primeval forest and metropolitan area (2013, background): “A potential explanation could be that wild boar in the BPF shift their ranges spatially according to spatiotemporal changes in food resources, which is similar to shifts described by Keuling et al. (2009) for wild boar in Germany.”