How does hunting influence activity and spatial usage in wild boar Sus scrofa L.?

By O. Keuling, N. Stier, M. Roth. Zeitschrift f\ ur Jagdwissenschaft, 2008

222 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Responding to spatial and temporal variations in predation risk: space use of a game species in a changing landscape of fear (2009, background): “The nocturnal activity of wild boar (Keuling et al. 2008b), and heterogeneities of the sampling protocol (unequal season lengths) may explain these variations, as well as differences in spatial and temporal risk.”
Spatiotemporal behavioral plasticity of wild boar (Sus scrofa) under contrasting conditions of human pressure: primeval forest and metropolitan area (2013, methodology): “…size of wild boar (Sus scrofa), but with no clear pattern with regard to sex and age-related differences, seasonal changes, and geographic location (Baber and Coblentz 1986; Boitani et al. 1994; Keuling et al. 2008b; Lemel et al. 2003; Massei et al. 1997; Russo et al. 1997; Singer et al. 1981).”
Effects of hunting on wild boar Sus scrofa behaviour (2013, methodology): “A spatial study including several areas with different hunting regimes (Keuling et al. 2008b) andwith focus ondamage to cropsmight be themost useful study from a management perspective.”