Bringing institutions into evolutionary growth theory

By Richard R. Nelson. 2002

250 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2e5d423dafd0ee78af4e027166ab9c703eda006f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Mike W. Peng
2. S. Lundan
3. John H. Dunning
4. Brian Wu
5. G. Kallis
6. R. Norgaard
7. Sea-Jin Chang
8. P. Pelikán

Citations in the corpus

• Coevolutionary ecological economics (2010, background): “Here too possibilities abound and include — among others — coevolution of technologies and institutions (Nelson, 2002), populations of industries and universities (Murmann, 2003), behaviors and institutions (van den Bergh and Stagl, 2003), populations of producers and consumers, or supply–demand…”
• An evolutionary approach to understanding international business activity: The co-evolution of MNEs and the institutional environment (2010, unknown): “…an integrative framework for a topic as broad and complex as the co-evolution of MNEs and institutions, we have adopted an approach that borrows from the recent contributions of two noted scholars: North (1990, 2005) in economic history, and Nelson (2002, 2003, 2007) in evolutionary economics.”
• Institutional Barriers and Industry Dynamics (2014, methodology): “We contribute to the economics literature by developing a theoretical framework in which firms differ not only in physical technology, but also in social technology (Nelson, 2002; Nelson and Sampat, 2001).”
• The economic agent as rule maker and rule user: Homo Sapiens Oeconomicus (2004, unknown): “It begins with the complex decision to adopt a given rule (Winter, 2004), to learn it, to adapt it to fit into the existing knowledge base of the agent in phase 2 (Day, 1975; Dosi et al., 2004), and finally to stabilize the adopted rule in the knowledge base for recurrent use in phase three ( Nelson”
• The institutional origins of dynamic capabilities in multinational enterprises (2010, background): “The links to the evolutionary literature here are quite evident (see e.g. Nelson (2002; 2006a) and Nelson and Sampat (2001)).”
• Bringing institutions into evolutionary economics: another view with links to changes in physical and social technologies (2003, background): “1 1 Introduction Like Nelson (2002), I am convinced of the need to bring economic institutions into evolutionary growth theory, and more generally, of the need to connect institutional economics with evolutionary economics, not only for further development of theory, but also, and perhaps above all,”