Truthful auctions for pricing search keywords
By Gagan Aggarwal, Ashish Goel, Rajeev Motwani. ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, 2006
363 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2e23a2e4114dce65f76f137fba23bddc15faa995
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- Optimized Cost per Click in Taobao Display Advertising (2017, background): “Although advertisers assume less risk with CPS [7, 2, 21], compared to CPC, CPS ignores the value of clicks, providing worse traffic liquidating efficiency.”
- Efficient Ranking in Sponsored Search (2011, background): “While the second-price rule amounts to the Vickrey payment with a single slot, this is no longer the case with multiple slots, and it is well-known that for K > 1 sponsored search auctions are not truthful [1].”
- AdWords and generalized on-line matching (2005, background): “Furthermore, the explicit form of incentive compatible payments for ranking auctions is carried out in [ AGM06 , IK06].”
- The adwords problem: online keyword matching with budgeted bidders under random permutations (2009, background): “Some of the features that have been considered (or ignored) in the models [20, 8, 19, 16, 18, 4, 7, 17, 1, 9] include: online vs. offline or equilibrium properties, algorithm design vs mechanism design, single keyword vs multiple keywords, incorporating budgets or not, and pay per click vs pay per…”