AdWords and generalized on-line matching
By Aranyak Mehta, Amin Saberi, Umesh V. Vazirani, Vijay V. Vazirani. IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2005
944 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6fd59986eec1be8bc5544ed6f8d1c60fb8242b64
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
- Aranyak Mehta
- Niv Buchbinder
- Kenneth J. Goldman
- Benjamin E. Birnbaum
- Nikhil R. Devanur
- T. Hayes
- Joseph (Seffi) Naor
- Sergei Vassilvitskii
In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
- Aranyak Mehta
- Niv Buchbinder
- Kamal Kumar Jain
- Joseph (Seffi) Naor
- Sergei Vassilvitskii
- Silvio Lattanzi
- Renato Paes Leme
- Paul Dütting
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Aranyak Mehta
- Nikhil R. Devanur
- T. Hayes
- Niv Buchbinder
- Joseph (Seffi) Naor
- Weinan Zhang
- Qiqi Yan
- Mohammad Mahdian
Citations in the corpus
- The Design of Competitive Online Algorithms via a Primal-Dual Approach (2009, background): “[82] builds on previous work on online bipartite matching [73] and online b-matching [69].”
- The adwords problem: online keyword matching with budgeted bidders under random permutations (2009, methodology): “Some of the features that have been considered (or ignored) in the models [20, 8, 19, 16, 18, 4, 7, 17, 1, 9] include: online vs. offline or equilibrium properties, algorithm design vs mechanism design, single keyword vs multiple keywords, incorporating budgets or not, and pay per click vs pay per…”
- Online bipartite matching with random arrivals: an approach based on strongly factor-revealing LPs (2011, methodology): “If LPs in such a family have a nice form, we can solve each of them analytically and get a tight bound on the ratio of the algorithm (as was done in [15, 11]).”
- A Dynamic Near-Optimal Algorithm for Online Linear Programming (2009, neutral): “G T ] 1 6 N ov 2 00”
- Streaming graph partitioning for large distributed graphs (2012, methodology): “[27] on an algorithm for AdWords.”
- Online mobile Micro-Task Allocation in spatial crowdsourcing (2016, background): “In addition, a close branch of research is the online maximum weighted bipartite matching (OMWBM) problem [9], [10], [11], where the information of the left-hand vertices in a bipartite graph is known, and the right-hand vertices arrive dynamically.”
- An Improved Analysis for a Greedy Remote-Clique Algorithm Using Factor-Revealing LPs (2006, methodology): “This technique was used in [7, 14, 15] before it was explicitly named and used in [11, 12, 16].”
- Secretary Problems via Linear Programming (2010, methodology): “Our linear programming technique is similar to the technique of factor revealing linear programs that have been used successfully in many different settings [7, 12, 14, 19].”
- Online Matching and Ad Allocation (2013, methodology): “The Adwords problem with the small bids assumption can be solved with a (1 − 4) approximation if the bid to budget ratio is at most [23].”
- There’s plenty of room at the Top: What will drive computer performance after Moore’s law? (2020, methodology): “Google ’ s PageRank algorithm ( 18 ) made its World Wide Web search superior, and the auction algorithms of Google AdWords ( 19 ), which allow advertisers to bid for display space based on users ’ search terms, made it highly profitable.”
- Optimal real-time bidding for display advertising (2014, background): “Nonetheless, most research has been so far limited to keyword auction in the context of sponsored search (SS) [15, 4, 28].”
- Online Primal-Dual Algorithms for Maximizing Ad-Auctions Revenue (2007, methodology): “The(1−1/e) competitive factor is tight for the general ad-auctions model considered by [15].”