An intention-activation account of residual switch costs

By Ritske de Jong. 2000

359 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2e1a1736c0798b0760b7c7efc2cfff969829eebc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Is there an age deficit in the selection of mental sets? (2001, background): “…that the quality of high-level representations may be codetermined by a number of diVerent factors, such as experimental context (i.e., West, this issue), attentional resources (Duncan, Emslie, Williams, Johnson, & Freer, 1996), or motivational/intentional settings (De Jong, 2000, this issue).”
The multi-component model of working memory: explorations in experimental cognitive psychology. (2006, background): “Most authors agree with such a multi-component notion of task switching (e.g. De Jong, 2000; Goschke, 2000; Rubinstein et al., 2001; Saeki and Saito, 2004).”
A computational model of fractionated conflict-control mechanisms in task-switching. (2007, background): “…and maintain this Please cite this article in press as: Brown, J. W. et al., A computational model of fractionated ..., Cognitive Psychology (2006), doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.09.005 configuration across a delay (De Jong, 2000; De Jong et al., 1999; Meiran, 1996; Nieuwenhuis & Monsell, 2002).”
Task switching: interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. (2010, background): “De Jong (2000) introduced the notion of failure to engage in task-set preparation to account for the residual switch cost.”
Adult age differences in goal activation and goal maintenance (2001, methodology): “De Jong (2000) proposed an intention–activation account of failures to engage in advance preparation in task switching.”
Task-switching and long-term priming: role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. (2003, background): “…of the target stimulus some further control process then somehow ‘‘completes’’ the task reconfiguration before the subject is ready to go, hence, residual TSCs represent the time demands of this hypothetical post-stimulus control process (see also De Jong, 2000; Rubinstein, Meyer, & Evans, 2001).”
Control and interference in task switching--a review. (2010, methodology): “As evidence for this assumption, De Jong (2000) put forward a formal mixture model.”
How positive affect modulates cognitive control: reduced perseveration at the cost of increased distractibility. (2004, neutral): “Although it is well documented that switching from one task to another is associated with RT costs (e.g., Allport, Styles, & Hsieh, 1994; De Jong, 2000; Mayr & Keele, 2000; Meiran, Chorev, & Sapir, 2000; Rogers & Monsell, 1995; Sohn & Carlson, 2000), Experiment 1 extends this finding in showing…”
Neural mechanisms of transient and sustained cognitive control during task switching. (2003, background): “Based on the previous literature, our prediction was that lateral PFC and parietal cortex would portion of the distribution (De Jong, 2000).”
Task Switching: Mechanisms Underlying Rigid vs. Flexible Self-control (2009, result): “Th is result is incompatible with the postponed preparation idea of de Jong (2000) and Rogers and Monsell (1995) but is in line with the idea concerning a carryover of inner obstacles.”