Task Switching: Mechanisms Underlying Rigid vs. Flexible Self-control
By Nachshon Meiran. 2009
135 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/27fbb8dbf1c574948e0eb55c3525e9e732ea5217
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
In Cognitive Neuroscience
In General Decision Sciences
Citations in the corpus
- Language switching in picture naming: What asymmetric switch costs (do not) tell us about inhibition in bilingual speech planning (2013, methodology): “…literature, 2 For example, some residual costs may be related to the need to reconfigure task sets (e.g. Monsell, Yeung, & Azuma l (2000); see Meiran (2010) for discussion of other subcomponents of task switching costs. bivalent stimuli reliably show switch costs, while univalent stimuli do…”
- A systematic review of the relationship between rigidity/flexibility and transdiagnostic cognitive and behavioral processes that maintain psychopathology (2018, methodology): “It is recommended that researchers use more than one rigidity paradigm in order to measure general flexibility rather than task-specific processes (Meiran, 2010; Snyder et al., 2015) and chose paradigms that specifically measure different aspects of executive functioning.”