Prefrontal cortex involvement in preattentive auditory deviance detection: : neuroimaging and electrophysiological evidence

By Christian F. Doeller, B. Opitz, Axel Mecklinger, C. Krick, W. Reith, Erich Schröger. NeuroImage, 2003

337 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Signal Processing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2dcb3fd6b2af7e232d8713b57757c4235448c73d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Karl J. Friston
2. Klaas E. Stephan
3. Torsten Baldeweg
4. Stefan J. Kiebel
5. James M. Kilner
6. Marta Isabel Garrido
7. Rosalyn J. Moran
8. Jean Daunizeau

In Signal Processing

1. Stefan J. Kiebel
2. Klaas E. Stephan
3. James M. Kilner
4. Karl J. Friston
5. Marta Isabel Garrido
6. Rosalyn J. Moran
7. Petri Paavilainen
8. Kimmo Alho

Citations in the corpus

• Adults and children processing music: An fMRI study (2005, background): “, 2003), linguistic stimuli (for a review, see Friederici, 2002), auditory oddball paradigms (Doeller et al., 2003; Opitz et al., 2002), pitch discrimination tasks (Gaab et al.”
• The mismatch negativity: A review of underlying mechanisms (2009, methodology): “…auditory sequence (Näätänen, 1992), and that a temporo-prefrontal network, comparing the current sensory input with a memory trace of previous stimuli, is responsible for generating this response at the scalp level (Giard et al., 1990; Rinne et al., 2000; Opitz et al., 2002; Doeller et al., 2003).”
• ERP Repetition Effects and Mismatch Negativity Generation A Predictive Coding Perspective (2007, background): “Converging evidence for multiple generators comes also from neuroimaging studies (e.g., Mueller, Jueptner, Jentzen, & Muller, 2002; Opitz, Rinne, Mecklinger, von Cramon, & Schroger, 2002; Doeller et al., 2003).”
• The Frontal Generator of the Mismatch Negativity Revisited (2007, background): “Nevertheless, in two other studies smaller-sized pitch deviants (33% difference) again activated the right (but not left) IFG more than larger (67% or 100%) deviations (Doeller et al., 2003), and small duration decrements activated bilateral IFG more than large duration decrements (Rinne et al.”
• Synaptic plasticity and dysconnection in schizophrenia. (2006, background): “First of all, there is strong consensus across studies and techniques that MMN responses are not only expressed in primary auditory but also in secondary auditory and prefrontal areas (Brazdil et al 2005; Doeller et al 2003; Liasis et al 2001; Pincze et al 2001).”
• The neural circuitry of pre-attentive auditory change-detection: an fMRI study of pitch and duration mismatch negativity generators. (2005, methodology): “In a separate study, Doeller et al. (2003) used fMRI to examine MMN activations as a function of changes in both tone frequency and tone location.”
• The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review. (2007, methodology): “…and/or differences in orientation between the sources of the MMN responses to intensity, frequency, ISI, or duration changes (Rosburg, 2003; Frodl-Bauch et al., 1997; Giard et al., 1995; Levänen et al., 1993, 1996; see also Deouell and Bentin, 1998; Deouell et al., 1998; Doeller et al., 2003).”
• Dynamic causal modeling for EEG and MEG (2009, methodology): “We motivated our prior source locations using findings in the MMN literature [Doeller et al., 2003; Opitz et al., 2002].”