Deep Haptic Model Predictive Control for Robot-Assisted Dressing
By Zackory Erickson, Henry M. Clever, Greg Turk, C. Karen Liu, Charles C. Kemp. 2017
93 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Robot-assisted dressing offers an opportunity to benefit the lives of many people with disabilities, such as some older adults. However, robots currently lack common sense about the physical implications of their actions on people. The physical implications of dressing are complicated by non-rigid garments, which can result in a robot indirectly applying high forces to a person's body. We present a deep recurrent model that, when given a proposed action by the robot, predicts the forces a garment will apply to a person's body. We also show that a robot can provide better dressing assistance by using this model with model predictive control. The predictions made by our model only use haptic and kinematic observations from the robot's end effector, which are readily attainable. Collecting training data from real world physical human-robot interaction can be time consuming, costly, and put people at risk. Instead, we train our predictive model using data collected in an entirely self-supervised fashion from a physics-based simulation. We evaluated our approach with a PR2 robot that attempted to pull a hospital gown onto the arms of 10 human participants. With a 0.2s prediction horizon, our controller succeeded at high rates and lowered applied force while navigating the garment around a persons fist and elbow without getting caught. Shorter prediction horizons resulted in significantly reduced performance with the sleeve catching on the participants' fists and elbows, demonstrating the value of our model's predictions. These behaviors of mitigating catches emerged from our deep predictive model and the controller objective function, which primarily penalizes high forces.
Subfields: Control and Systems Engineering, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Control and Systems Engineering
- Andy Zeng
- Sergey Levine
- Peter R. Florence
- Jonathan Tompson
- Ken Goldberg
- Oliver Kroemer
- Danica Kragic
- Jake Olkin
In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
In Mechanical Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- SoftGym: Benchmarking Deep Reinforcement Learning for Deformable Object Manipulation (2020, background): “Robotic manipulation of deformable objects has a rich history across various fields, such as folding laundry [1], preparing food [18], or assistive dressing and feeding [19, 20].”
- Modeling, learning, perception, and control methods for deformable object manipulation (2021, methodology): “Physical fidelity and interpretability Not well integrated to rebotics simulator yet Food (29)”
- Deep Imitation Learning of Sequential Fabric Smoothing Policies (2019, background): “Robot manipulation of fabric has applications in senior care and dressing assistance [11], [12], [13], sewing [41], ironing [21], laundry folding [22], [27], [44], [54], fabric upholstery manufacturing [32], [50], and handling gauze in robotic surgery [48].”
- Learning to Rearrange Deformable Cables, Fabrics, and Bags with Goal-Conditioned Transporter Networks (2020, methodology): “Motivated by these challenges, we provide support for deformable objects (called “soft bodies”) in PyBullet [14], a widely-used publicly available simulator for robotics research.”
- A Review of Tactile Information: Perception and Action Through Touch (2020, background): “HRI applications span a wide range of different tasks including intuitive programming [220], putting on clothing [226], handing over objects [249], safe interaction with collaborative robots [250], [251], and shaving [221].”