The Future of Empirical Methods in Software Engineering Research
By Dag I.K. Sjøberg, Tore Dybå, Magne Jørgensen. Future of Software Engineering (FOSE '07), 2007
470 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Science Applications, Information Systems
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2d69014c0d601c202f0c33dde2f646e8f31183c5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Science Applications
- Daniela Soares Cruzes
- Tony Gorschek
- Michael Unterkalmsteiner
- Robert Feldt
- Tore Dybå
- Marco Tulio de Oliveira Valente
- Hudson Silva Borges
- Maurizio Morisio
In Information Systems
- Tony Gorschek
- Daniela Soares Cruzes
- Michael Unterkalmsteiner
- Robert Feldt
- I. Chow
- R. Permadi
- A. K. M. Moinul
- Kian-Kai Cheng
Citations in the corpus
- A method for evaluating rigor and industrial relevance of technology evaluations (2011, background): “Rigor refers to both how an evaluation is performed and how it is reported.”
- Research synthesis in software engineering: A tertiary study (2011, methodology): “Closely related issues, therefore, are the evaluation of the quality of primary studies [53], the decisions of which studies should be included, and how the evidence should be weighted according to quality and suitability for the SR.”
- Evaluation and Measurement of Software Process Improvement—A Systematic Literature Review (2012, result): “The result of QA3 confirms the observation in [98] that in empirical studies the scope of validity is scarcely discussed.”
- Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review (2008, unknown): “In [58], Sjøberg et al.”