A method for evaluating rigor and industrial relevance of technology evaluations

By Martin Ivarsson, Tony Gorschek. Empirical Software Engineering, 2011

318 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study (2014, methodology): “Weuse a systematic and validated model [51] to evaluate the scientific rigor and the industrial relevance of each primary study.”
Systematic literature studies: Database searches vs. backward snowballing (2012, background): “It should be noted that a general problem with systematic literature reviews in software engineering is that in many cases existing papers are hard to classify and analyze since in many of the published studies, the contextual information is not well documented or the studies are not conducted in a ”
Software Engineering for AI-Based Systems: A Survey (2021, methodology): “More precisely, we applied Ivarsson and Gorscheck’s rigor and relevance quality assessment model [91] for the quality appraisal, and we used the knowledge areas listed in the SWEBOK v3.”