Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation

By E. Schegloff. 2000

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Generative Spoken Dialogue Language Modeling (2022, background): “However, all the progress in this research work centered around text dialogues leaving out non-lexical information (Schuller et al., 2013; Ang et al., 2002) in human-human dialogues, e.g., emotion, pauses, laughter, hesitation, and inter-ruption.”
Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. (2001, background): “To illustrate, turn-taking is a central organizational feature on which much else in conversation depends (Sacks et al. 1974; Schegloff 2000; Wilson et al. 1984).”
Non-native speech perception in adverse conditions: A review (2010, background): “…out using conversational tasks, so we do not know how noise affects the ability of non-native listeners to process and generate high-level interactional cues (e.g. Schegloff, 2000) and the extent to which non-native listeners are capable of aligning in conversations (e.g. Pickering & Garrod, 2005).”
High-quality Connections (2011, background): “393) individual or pair of programmers speaks out on their current needs (Schegloff, 2000).”
The Conversation Analytic Approach to Transcription (2012, background): “CA research has amply demonstrated the incredible precision with which interlocutors coordinate their talk (e.g. Jefferson, 1973, 1984a, 1986, 1989; Sacks, Schegloff & Jefferson, 1974; Schegloff, 2000).”
Toward a Learning Behavior Tracking Methodology for CA-for-SLA (2007, background): “…of interactional import and reactivity, recipient design, moment-to-moment recalibration, reorganization and recompletion, and to interactional co-construction’ (Schegloff 1996: 55–6; see also Goodwin 1979; Hayashi 2003, 2004; Lerner 1991, 1996, 2004; Schegloff 2000; Taleghani-Nikazm 2006).”
A Finite-State Turn-Taking Model for Spoken Dialog Systems (2009, background): “Decades of research on Conversation Analysis and psycholin-guistics (Duncan, 1972; Sacks et al., 1974; Ore-str¨om, 1983; Schegloff, 2000; Wesseling and van Son, 2005) have shown that human turn-taking behavior relies on a wide range of rules and signals at many different levels of language, from…”
From Talk to Text: The Interactional Construction of a Police Record (2006, background): “At the same time, the record shows that P does take note of (some of) what the suspect says in overlap with his typing: “I don’t remember exactly” (cf. Schegloff, 2000).”
Footing in human-robot conversations: How robots might shape participant roles using gaze cues (2009, background): “Gaze direction also serves as an important cue in shifting roles during turn-exchanges [13,23,24,35,38] and overlapping talk [39].”
Complaint Sequences Within Antagonistic Argument (2000, background): “For the delineation of further ways in which overlapping talk can be designed so as resist the other speaker, see Jefferson and Schegloff (1975) and Schegloff (2000).”
Pragmatic aspects of temporal accommodation in turn-taking (2011, background): “…typically conducted in the Conversational Analysis framework, presents insightful qualitative observations from individual transcribed examples and attempts to relate them to the general framework of sequence organization of turn-taking (e.g. Schegloff, 2000; Jefferson, 1986; Auer et al., 1999).”