Prefrontal cortical function and anxiety: controlling attention to threat-related stimuli
By Sonia J. Bishop, John S. Duncan, Matthew Brett, Andrew D. Lawrence. Nature Neuroscience, 2004
968 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2ce0d2f6efe74b9df4c0eccb434322d931c5dd47
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Tor D. Wager
- Amit Etkin
- Lisa Feldman Barrett
- Luiz Pessoa
- Gregory J. Quirk
- Israel Liberzon
- Lisa M. Shin
- Sonia J. Bishop
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Hugo D. Critchley
- Małgorzata Ilkowska
- Tor D. Wager
- N. Derakshan
- Ernst H. W. Koster
- Sonia J. Bishop
- M. Eysenck
- Amit Etkin
Citations in the corpus
- Theories and measurement of visual attentional processing in anxiety (2008, background): “executive control areas in the presence of task-irrelevant threat stimuli (Bishop et al., 2004).”
- A taxonomy of external and internal attention. (2011, positive): “Meditation and mindfulness benefit sustained attention (Bishop et al. 2004, Lutz et al. 2008).”
- Cognitive bias as an indicator of animal emotion and welfare: Emerging evidence and underlying mechanisms (2009, background): “The neural basis of such effects may involve modulatory signals from the amygdala enhancing threat-processing, and overriding those from prefrontal cortex that support ongoing ‘neutral’ taskrelated processing (Mathews and Mackintosh, 1998; Bishop et al., 2004; Bishop, 2007; see also DeRubeis et al.,”
- Anterior cingulate activity during error and autonomic response (2005, background): “…coactivation of inferior frontal gyrus and rACC is reported during performance of Stroop tasks where there is competition from taskirrelevant distractor stimuli including threat (Milham et al., 2003; Bishop et al., 2004) and also during error trials in go/no-go tasks (Menon et al., 2001).”
- The role of lateral orbitofrontal cortex in the inhibitory control of emotion (2006, background): “…systems, this does not seem to be the case, since some cognitive tasks, such as modulation of belief reasoning, show only right hemisphere involvement (Goel and Dolan 2003), and some emotional tasks, such as inhibiting a fearful face, show only left hemisphere involvement (Bishop et al. 2004).”
- Trait and State Differences in Working Memory Capacity (2010, background): “In social contexts, the ACC has been implicated in conflict resolution involving emotional stimuli, especially when reacting to conflict from emotionally salient, irrelevant distractors (Bishop et al., 2004).”
- The Effect of High-Anxiety Situations on Conspiracy Thinking (2013, background): “2007; Mathews and MacLeod 1994; Mathews and Mackintosh 1998; Yiend and Mathews 2001) and reduced control over threat-related stimuli (Bishop et al. 2004).”
- Fear extinction in rats: implications for human brain imaging and anxiety disorders. (2006, background): “A recent fMRI study showed that humans with high levels of anxiety (due to the expectancy of threat-related stimuli) showed reduced mPFC activity (Bishop et al., 2004).”
- Emotion and the Prefrontal Cortex: An Integrative Review (2017, background): “This type of regulation may rely on interactions between the lateral OFC and lateral PFC, given the well-established role of lateral PFC in directing attention based on current goals and task demands (Bishop et al., 2004; Buschman & Miller, 2007; Corbetta & Shulman, 2002; Hampshire, Thompson, Duncan”
- Neurocognitive mechanisms of anxiety: an integrative account. (2007, methodology): “Please cite this article in press as: Bishop, S.J., Neurocognitive mechanisms of anxiety: an integrative account, Trends Cogn. Sci. (2007), doi:10.”
- Anxiety and cognitive performance: attentional control theory. (2007, positive): “This is an area closely resembling the one found by Bishop et al. (2004) to be associated with effects of anxiety on attention. This additional brain activation was significantly greater in high-anxious than in low-anxious participants. The finding that impaired processing efficiency in high anxiety”
- Neurobiological Mechanisms of the Placebo Effect (2005, background): “, 2005) and anxiety (Bishop et al., 2004).”