Macrophyte and fish chemicals suppress Daphnia growth and alter life-history traits
By R. Burks, Erik Jeppesen, David M. Lodge. 2000
93 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2cd5913218962e9498397e8e3f012ee3c62113e2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Environmental Chemistry
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Chemical communication in aquatic systems: an introduction (2000, background): “In predator-prey interactions there are basically two sources of chemical signals available to warn prey of the proximity of predators: substances released directly by the predator (kairomone) and substances released by an injured prey (alarm substances; see Chivers and Smith (1998) for a review of ”
- Chemically induced anti-predator defences in plankton: a review (2004, background): “…(Taleb et al., 1993; Watt & Young, 1994; Kvam & Kleiven, 1995; Lauridsen et al., 1996; O’Bryan & Forrester, 1997; Lauridsen et al., 1998; Lauridsen et al., 1999; Burks et al., 2000) and several patterns of horizontal migration have been observed (e.g. seasonal, daily) (O’Bryan & Forrester, 1997).”
- PREDATOR CHEMICALS INDUCE CHANGES IN MAYFLY LIFE HISTORY TRAITS: A WHOLE-STREAM MANIPULATION (2002, background): “However, mechanisms deduced from these small-scale experiments, which isolated only a few species from the community in simplified environments, may not accurately reflect life history traits of individuals living in complex, natural systems (Wilbur and Fauth 1990, Burks et al. 2000).”
- Oviposition habitat selection for a predator refuge and food source in a mosquito (2005, background): “When such experiments involve exposure only to water previously inhabited by predators, the causes of changes in aquatic arthropod behaviour and life-history traits can be assigned to specific anti-predation responses (Sih, 1986; Burks et al., 2000; Peckarsky et al., 2002), whereas evaluation of d”