PREDATOR CHEMICALS INDUCE CHANGES IN MAYFLY LIFE HISTORY TRAITS: A WHOLE-STREAM MANIPULATION

By B. Peckarsky, A. Mcintosh, B. W. Taylor, J. Dahl. 2002

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1b20068e336c671a1edd772e1f961e8ea5f91b95

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. M. Power
2. J. Holomuzki
3. John Feminella
4. R. Stubbington

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. M. Power
2. J. Holomuzki
3. John Feminella
4. R. McDowall
5. Y. Vadeboncoeur
6. R. Stubbington

Citations in the corpus

• The influence of predatory fish on mayfly drift: extrapolating from experiments to nature (2002, background): “We have previously observed B. bicaudatus responding to brook trout odour piped into natural streams over scales ranging from 3.5 m (McIntosh et al., 1999) to 30 m (Peckarsky et al., 2002).”
• Biotic interactions in freshwater benthic habitats (2010, background): “…prey have been detected at the scale of microhabitat patches (Kershner and Lodge 1995, Fairchild and Holomuzki 2005), macrohabitats (stream reaches, Peckarsky et al. 2002; stream pools, Power et al. 1985, Wiseman et al. 1993), and entire systems (small ponds or lakes, Carlisle and Hawkins 1998,…”
• Oviposition habitat selection for a predator refuge and food source in a mosquito (2005, background): “When such experiments involve exposure only to water previously inhabited by predators, the causes of changes in aquatic arthropod behaviour and life-history traits can be assigned to specific anti-predation responses (Sih, 1986; Burks et al., 2000; Peckarsky et al., 2002 ), whereas evaluation of d”