Chemical communication in aquatic systems: an introduction
By C. Brönmark, Lars-Anders Hansson. 2000
248 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/80847bba167abed390a6eb56604f9610c44599ea
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecological Modeling
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- N. Mazzeo
- M. Meerhoff
- Erik Jeppesen
- J. Engström-Öst
- Timothy D. Clark
- Maiju Lehtiniemi
- G. Raby
- R. McDowall
Citations in the corpus
- Two‐current choice flumes for testing avoidance and preference in aquatic animals (2017, background): “Traditionally, chemical ecology has been dominated by work on terrestrial animals (e.g. insects), while the aquatic realm has seen less research activity (Br€onmark & Hansson 2000; Hay 2009; Brooker & Dixson 2016).”
- Turbidity decreases anti-predator behaviour in pike larvae, Esox lucius (2005, background): “Light conditions and turbidity of water greatly influence the use of vision in aquatic environment (e.g. Brönmark & Hansson 2000).”
- An experimental study of habitat choice by Daphnia: plants signal danger more than refuge in subtropical lakes (2006, background): “The maintenance of a herbivorous zooplankton population that can graze algae has individual, population and even ecosystem consequences (Brönmark & Hansson, 2000; Jeppesen et al., 2002).”
- PREDATOR CHEMICALS INDUCE CHANGES IN MAYFLY LIFE HISTORY TRAITS: A WHOLE-STREAM MANIPULATION (2002, background): “Furthermore, observations made at small spatial and temporal scales in simple environments often cannot be extrapolated to scales relevant to the organisms or processes under investigation (Peckarsky et al. 1997, Petersen et al. 1999, Brönmark and Hansson 2000).”
- The Hydrodynamics of Chemical Cues Among Aquatic Organisms (2009, background): “…processes controlled by water-borne chemicals include predator avoidance (Covich et al. 1994, Zimmer et al. 2006), chemical defense (Larsson & Dodson 1993), habitat choice (Gerlach et al. 2007, Pawlik 1992), and sibling and individual recognition (Brönmark & Hansson 2000, Gherardi et al. 2005).”