Psychological testing and psychological assessment. A review of evidence and issues.
By G. Meyer, S. Finn, L. Eyde, G. Kay, K. L. Moreland, R. R. Dies, Elena J. Eisman, T. Kubiszyn, Geoffrey M. Reed. American Psychologist, 2001
1,293 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2c7c0a3f70a4599282eff1364f76500147153ad5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- Nansook Park
- Christopher Peterson
- Martin E. P. Seligman
- R. Proyer
- Willibald F. Ruch
- Samuel D. Gosling
- Avshalom Caspi
- D. Chan
In Clinical Psychology
- Peter Salovey
- J. Mayer
- Marc A. Brackett
- B. Roberts
- D. Caruso
- Joseph Ciarrochi
- P. Lopes
- Samuel D. Gosling
Citations in the corpus
- The Relationship Between Working Alliance and Rehabilitation Outcomes (2002, background): “The importance of these effect sizes is illustrated by comments by Wampold (2001) and Meyer et al. (2001).”
- Essentials of Psychological Testing (2005, background): “Nevertheless, in recent years, evidence of the efficacy of assessment, at least in the realm of health care delivery, has begun to be assembled (Eisman et al., 2000; Kubiszyn et al., 2000; Meyer et al., 2001).”
- Personality Development and Organizational Behavior (2006, background): “The large majority of effect sizes in psychology are between 0.1 and 0.3 on a correlational scale (Meyer et al., 2001).”
- Let's put the person back into entrepreneurship research: A meta-analysis on the relationship between business owners' personality traits, business creation, and success (2007, background): “…that the effect sizes for the taskrelated traits are as high as the effect sizes for the following medical diagnostics: conventional x-rays and tooth cavities (r¼ .36), or cardiac tests and prediction of death or myocardial infarct within 1 week of vascular surgery (r¼ .20) (Meyer et al., 2001).”
- Are Social Media Ruining Our Lives? A Review of Meta-Analytic Evidence (2019, result): “20 corresponds to the effectiveness of nicotine patches on smoking abstinence, is even twice the correlation between gender and risk-taking behavior (Meyer et al., 2001) and compares to the effect of four additional years of education on intelligence gains (Ritchie & Tucker-Drob, 2018).”
- Evidence-Based Assessment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Children and Adolescents (2005, background): “…long known that the source of ratings and method of measurement contribute a significant portion of the variance in correlations between measures and criteria (e.g., Campbell & Fiske, 1959; Gomez, Burns, Walsh, & de Moura, 2003; Langhorne, Loney, Paternite, & Bechtoldt, 1976; Meyer et al., 2001).”
- GENDER AND FORGIVENESS: A META-ANALYTIC REVIEW AND RESEARCH AGENDA (2008, background): “Meyer et al. (2001) compiled 60 correlations between predictors and criterions of common psychological and medical constructs.”
- Maternal Depression and Child Psychopathology: A Meta-Analytic Review (2011, background): “…in meta-analyses of other risk factors and across a range or other predicted associations and are clinically meaningful (Amato and Keith 1991; Kitzmann et al. 2003; Meyer et al. 2001), they underscore the importance of developing and testing models with multiple co-occurring risk factors.”