Repeatability estimates do not always set an upper limit to heritability

By M. R. Dohm. 2002

377 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2c15714efd3a650d4154c2eb5ad292cc0a558d3d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Denis Réale
2. N. Dingemanse
3. J. Stamps
4. Alastair J. Wilson
5. Andrew Sih
6. Shinichi Nakagawa
7. D. Nussey
8. P. Biro

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. N. Dingemanse
2. J. Stamps
3. Andrew Sih
4. P. Biro
5. Denis Réale
6. J. Cote
7. A. Bell
8. N. Dochtermann

Citations in the corpus

• Estimating genetic parameters in natural populations using the "animal model". (2004, background): “However, see Dohm (2002) for consideration of unusual situations in which the repeatability may not set an upper limit on the heritability.”
• Using repeatability to study physiological and behavioural traits: Ignore time-related change at your peril (2015, background): “Broad sense repeatability is of interest in many areas of research because it indicates that a given type of behaviour or physiology can be considered to be a characteristic of an individual (i.e. a trait), and may reflect heritability (e.g. Falconer, 1981)but see (Dohm, 2002).”
• Quantifying individual variation in behaviour: mixed-effect modelling approaches. (2013, background): “…of Animal Ecology, 82, 39–54 Repeatability is of key importance because it provides a standardized estimate of individuality that can be compared across studies and is part of quantitative genetics theory by setting an upper limit to heritability (but see, e.g. Dohm 2002 for important caveats).”
• Unifying functional trait approaches to understand the assemblage of ecological communities: synthesizing taxonomic divides (2019, background): “However, it is often difficult to determine if a trait is adaptive or heritable without lengthy observation and/or experimentation (Dohm 2002, Mitchell 2004).”
• Macrophysiology: large‐scale patterns in physiological traits and their ecological implications (2004, background): “1998; Rinehart, Yocum & Denlinger 2000), genetic engineering (Feder, Blair & Figueras 1997; Feder 1999), studies of physiological flexibility (Hoffmann & Watson 1993; Huey & Berrigan 1996) and mensurate investigations of the conditions necessary for natural selection (Hayes, Garland & Dohm 1992; Cha”
• Repeatability for Gaussian and non‐Gaussian data: a practical guide for biologists (2010, background): “40, we can see how repeatability can set an upper limit to heritability (but see Dohm, 2002).”
• Personality-dependent dispersal: characterization, ontogeny and consequences for spatially structured populations (2010, background): “This prediction is supported by studies on western bluebirds (Duckworth & Badyaev 2007; Duckworth 2008, 2009; Duckworth & Kruuk 2009). At the interspecific level, Duckworth & Badyaev (2007) showed that because dispersing western bluebird individuals were also highly aggressive after immigration, thi”
• An ecologist's guide to the animal model. (2010, background): “…equal heritability in the extreme case that all differences among individuals are caused by additive genetic effects, it is generally considered to set the upper limit for h 2 (Falconer & Mackay 1996), although there are actually some situations in which this need not hold true (see Dohm 2002).”
• Aerobic scope predicts dominance during early life in a tropical damselfish (2014, background): “…outcomes of com- petitive interactions shuffle the rankings of surplus AS among subordinate individuals, which have not yet claimed territories, then the short-term repeatability of available AS may be diminished to the point where selection on intrinsic AS could be reduced or unstable (Dohm 2002).”
• Locomotor performance and social dominance in male Anolis cristatellus (2004, background): “Repeatability enhances the utility of physiological performance in evolutionary analyses (Chappell et al. 1996; Dohm 2002).”
• Guidelines for estimating repeatability (2012, background): “Researchers interested in the evolution of traits often use estimates of repeatability as a rough upper limit to the heritability (Boake 1989; Falconer & Mackay 1996; but see Dohm 2002).”
• The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis (2009, background): “In the past, most studies measured repeatability as a first step towards studying the genetic basis for a behaviour in order to set an upper bound to heritability (Boake 1989; Dohm 2002).”
• Individual variation in timing of migration: causes and reproductive consequences in greater snow geese (Anser caerulescens atlanticus) (2004, background): “Repeatability estimates can be considered an upper limit of heritability values (Falconer 1989; but see Dohm 2002 for assumptions and implications of violations).”
• Morphological stasis in the Eurytemora affinis species complex (Copepoda: Temoridae) (2002, methodology): “Broad sense heritabilities for morphometric traits were obtained by computing intraclass correlations (Brodie & Garland, 1993; Dohm, 2002)”
• Glucocorticoid-Mediated Phenotypes in Vertebrates : Multilevel Variation and Evolution (2016, background): “As a start, it is therefore useful to estimate the repeatability of traits, which can set an upper bound on heritability (Lessells & Boag, 1987; but see Dohm, 2002).”