Locomotor performance and social dominance in male Anolis cristatellus

By Gad Perry, Kate R. Levering, Isabelle A. Girard, Theodore Garland Jr.. 2004

209 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/496ee93da4b96ee0c3af239629802d267663be8c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Sexual selection on locomotor performance (2008, background): “In several lizard species, males with better maximal locomotor performance won more dyadic encounters on average (Garland et al., 1990; Robson and Miles, 2000; Perry et al., 2004), but not always (López and Martín, 2002; Huyghe et al.”
Multiple signals in chameleon contests: designing and analysing animal contests as a tournament (2006, result): “Many other studies have reported a relation between contest outcome and a measure of head size, including head depth, in lizards (Hews 1990; Kratochvil & Frynta 2002; López et al. 2002; Perry et al. 2004).”
Does dewlap size predict male bite performance in Jamaican Anolis lizards (2005, background): “Uta stansburiana (Brandt 2003) and A. cristatellus ( Perry et al . 2004 ).”
How and why the winner effect forms: influences of contest environment and species differences (2010, background): “…the degree to which individuals of a given species are territorial might predict the presence of the winner effect because this enhancement in winning ability likely improves an individual’s competitiveness during aggressive encounters (Walls and Semlitsch 1991; Kemp 2000; Perry et al. 2004).”
Morphology, performance and fighting capacity in male lizards, Gallotia galloti (2005, methodology): “Robson & Miles (2000) suggested that sprint speed is correlated with the frequency of head bobbing and push-up displays in Urosaurus ornatus , and Perry et al . (2004) linked endurance to the prolonged vigorous interactions in Anolis cristatellus . However, we can think of several other performanc”
Horn size predicts physical performance in the beetle Euoniticellus intermedius (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) (2005, background): “Several recent studies have also demonstrated a relationship between various locomotor capacities and the ability to win male‐male fights in lizards (Garland, Hankins & Huey 1990; Robson & Miles 2000; Perry et al . 2004; Lailvaux et al . 2004).”
Relating endocrinology, physiology and behaviour using species with alternative mating strategies (2007, background): “Recent work has shown that sprint speed and endurance may be important components of dominance behaviours in males (Garland, Hankins & Huey 1990; Kodric-Brown & Nicoletto 1993; Robson & Miles 2000; Perry et al. 2004).”
Evaluating performance costs of sexually selected traits (2007, background): “In Anolis cristatellus, dominance was positively related to endurance and to the rate of assertion displays in the field, but not to speed (Perry et al. 2004).”
Sexual and natural selection on body mass and metabolic rates in free‐living bank voles (2010, background): “Moreover, several intraspecific studies on mammals held in laboratory failed to show correlations between metabolic rate and life history traits at the level of individual variation (Earle & Lavigne 1990; Hayes, Garland&Dohm1992; Radwan et al. 2004; Johnston et al. 2007).”
Ultraviolet signals ultra-aggression in a lizard (2006, background): “circulating steroid hormones and immunocompetence) are all potentially important determinants of fighting ability and, therefore, of contest outcome (Anderson & Vitt 1990; Olsson 1992; López et al. 2002; Watt et al. 2003; Perry et al. 2004).”
Bite-Force Performance Predicts Dominance in Male Venerable Collared Lizards (Crotaphytus antiquus) (2006, methodology): “The hypothesis that sexual selection may impact the evolution of morphological traits via selection on whole-animal performance has received increasing attention in recent years (e.g., Lailvaux et al., 2004; Perry et al., 2004; Lappin and Husak, 2005 and references therein).”