Enforcement of Temporal Fidelity in Pyramidal Cells by Somatic Feed-Forward Inhibition

By F. Pouille, Massimo Scanziani. Science, 2001

1,110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2c0e042ea65034f612cd6ad7dce8a92128fa5919

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

Critical period plasticity in local cortical circuits (2005, background): “Sloppy gating by weak inhibition at the soma would prevent a competitive outcome by allowing excess back-propagation and spurious coincident activity with infrequent, deprived inputs from the retin”
Feed-Forward versus Feedback Inhibition in a Basic Olfactory Circuit (2015, background): “, olfactory cortex [52], hippocampus [4, 53], cerebellum [54, 55], LGN [56]), feedforward inhibition mediated by a population of inhibitory cells in the locust lateral horn (LH) was until recently thought to provide the necessary inhibitory input to the Kenyon cells (KCs) of the mushroom body [9, 23”
Distinct Determinants of Sparse Activation during Granule Cell Maturation (2013, background): “…enhancing variability in the sparse population coding of the DG. Finally, synaptic inhibition is also expected to contribute to the window of excitatory integration conferred by dendritic passive membrane properties (Pouille and Scanziani, 2001; Schmidt-Hieber et al., 2007; Krueppel et al., 2011).”
Variations on an inhibitory theme: phasic and tonic activation of GABAA receptors (2005, background): “For example, the selective activation of somatically terminating interneurons during feed-forward inhibition of hippocampal pyramidal cells produces a requirement for precise COINCIDENCE DETECTION of excitatory input at the soma, whereas dendrites can integrate synaptic input over longer time peri”
Cortical inhibitory neurons and schizophrenia (2005, background): “This disynaptic inhibitory input seems to limit the window of time, and thereby increases the temporal precision, for the summation of the excitatory inputs that are needed to evoke pyramidal neuron firin”
Adolescence as a neurobiological critical period for the development of higher-order cognition (2018, positive): “Multisynaptic inhibition by developed PV interneurons restricts the summation window for spike time dependent plasticity, favoring the most temporally synchronous inputs, and facilitates LTP plasticity of synapses (Pouille and Scanziani, 2001).”
Control of cerebellar granule cell output by sensory-evoked Golgi cell inhibition (2015, background): “This brief (∼5 ms) “time-windowing” effect enhances spike precision by reducing the window for temporal summation of discrete mossy fiber inputs (3, 7).”
Rhythms of the brain (2006, background): “Pouille and Scanziani (2004) have demonstrated that fast input activation shifts inhibition from the soma to the dendrites.”
The Theta-Gamma Neural Code (2013, positive): “Experimentally, this window is shorter than a gamma cycle (Losonczy and Magee, 2006; Pouille and Scanziani, 2001).”
Input-specific GABAergic signaling to newborn neurons in adult dentate gyrus (2009, background): “…domains of principal cells in a manner related to distinctive functional roles, with perisomatic synapses controlling the timing of neuronal output (Cobb et al., 1995; Pouille and Scanziani, 2001), and dendritic synapses controlling the integration of excitatory inputs (Miles et al., 1996).”
Inhibitory synaptic plasticity: spike timing-dependence and putative network function (2013, background): “…of these interneurons results in so called feed-forward inhibition onto those same pyramidal neurons, which can be so fast that excitation has not even reached its peak when inhibition begins to affect the postsynaptic membrane potential (Pouille and Scanziani, 2001; Ormond and Woodin, 2009).”
How Inhibition Shapes Cortical Activity (2011, positive): “…since afferent inputs contact both principal cells and interneurons, the onset of excitation recorded in principal neurons will precede the onset of inhibition by a monosynaptic delay (that can be as brief as one ms) (Gabernet et al., 2005; Pouille and Scanziani, 2001; Stokes and Isaacson, 2010).”
Interneurons of the neocortical inhibitory system (2004, background): “These interneurons are involved in phasing and synchronizing neuronal activit”
Oscillatory integration windows in neurons (2016, background): “Thus, integration windows provide a mechanism for reading out information contained in the precise timing of spikes (Pouille and Scanziani, 2001; Wehr and Zador, 2003; Luna and Schoppa, 2008).”
Optimal information storage and the distribution of synaptic weights: perceptron versus Purkinje cell. (2004, background): “The experiments of Figures 2–4 support this approximation. covery (Fatt and Katz, 1953; Eccles et al., 1967), two recent works (Pouille and Scanziani, 2001; Wehr andHowever, the model is able to accommodate a number of departures from this ideal behavior.”
Neural syntax: cell assemblies, synapsembles and readers (2010, neutral): “…2001; Geiger et al., 1997; Gulyás et al., 1993; Maurer et al., 2006b; Miles, 1990; Thomson et al., 2002) and strong inhibitory interneuronpyramidal cell connections (Cobb et al., 1995; Pouille and Scanziani, 2001), relative to the typically weak synapses linking principal cells (Miles, 1990).”
Amygdala inhibitory circuits and the control of fear memory. (2009, background): “In the striatum, a network of GABAergic projection neurons with local axon collaterals, in concert with distinct subgroups of local, inhibitory interneurons generates activity patterns that shape basal ganglia output and motor control (Kreitzer and Malenka, 2008; Tepper and Bolam, 2004).”