Drivers of Performance Information Use: Systematic Literature Review and Directions for Future Research

By Alexander Kroll. 2015

250 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Management Science and Operations Research, Public Administration

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2bc0fb983c31797dc58edaf5b2cf2963ee991d19

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

1. B. George
2. Stijn Goeminne
3. Søren Serritzlew
4. Mieke Audenaert
5. Adelien Decramer
6. Martin Baekgaard

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. B. George
2. Stijn Goeminne
3. Søren Serritzlew
4. Mieke Audenaert
5. Adelien Decramer
6. Martin Baekgaard

In Public Administration

1. B. George
2. Stijn Goeminne
3. Søren Serritzlew
4. Mieke Audenaert
5. Adelien Decramer
6. Martin Baekgaard

Citations in the corpus

• Institutional isomorphism, negativity bias and performance information use by politicians: A survey experiment (2020, methodology): “Purposeful use implies that the indicator is used as an analysis instrument to evaluate or learn more about the municipality's performance (Kroll 2015).”
• Interpreting Performance Information: Motivated Reasoning or Unbiased Comprehension (2016, background): “Th e fi ndings are also important to the broader literature on performance information use (for an overview, see Kroll 2015).”