Transition management: reflexive governance of societal complexity through searching, learning and experimenting

137 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Conceptualizing, Observing, and Influencing Social-Ecological Transitions (2009, background): “Persistent problems require transitions: fundamental changes in the structure, culture, and practices of societal systems (Rotmans and Loorbach 2008).”
Restructuring energy systems for sustainability? Energy transition policy in the Netherlands (2008, background): “Whereas earlier versions of the TM model excluded incumbent regime members from the process (Loorbach, 2002), more recently a role for those actors has been assumed to boost legitimacy, support and financing of the process (Rotmans and Loorbach, 2008).”
Policy mixes for incumbency: Exploring the destructive recreation of renewable energy, shale gas ‘fracking,’ and nuclear power in the United Kingdom (2017, unknown): “Contrasting approaches within this broad field include the functional approach to ‘technological innovation systems (TIS)’ (Markard et al. 2015), ‘transition management’ (Rotmans & Loorbach 2008), ‘strategic niche management’ (Witkamp et al. 2011) and the Multi-Level Perspective (MLP) (Geels 2010).”
A multi-level perspective on innovation ecosystems for path-breaking innovation (2017, unknown): “Reciprocal learning is more likely to happen with help of a third-party facilitator, such as an industry association or a governmental agency (Rotmans and Loorbach, 2006).”