Principles of Object Perception
By Elizabeth S. Spelke. 1990
Subfields: Neuroscience
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Neuroscience
- Josh Tenenbaum
- Brian J. Scholl
- Grgoire Montavon
- Daniel L. K. Yamins
- Yoshua Bengio
- Sebastian Lapuschkin
- Tomer D. Ullman
- Wojciech Samek
Citations in the corpus
- What can the brain teach us about building artificial intelligence? (2016, background): “iples of persistence, continuity, cohesion and solidity. Young infants believe objects should move along smooth paths, not wink in and out of existence, not inter-penetrate and not act at a distance (Spelke, 1990; Spelke, Gutheil, & Van de Walle, 1995). These expectations guide object segmentati”
- Learning Features by Watching Objects Move (2016, background): “Both infants [42] and newly sighted congenitally blind people [32] tend to oversegment static objects, but can group things properly when they move (Figure 1).”
- Toward Causal Representation Learning (2021, background): “Infants’ understanding of physics relies upon objects that can be tracked over time and behave consistently [53], [236].”
- Towards Causal Representation Learning (2021, background): “b) Issue 2 – Learning Reusable Mechanisms: Infants’ understanding of physics relies upon objects that can be tracked over time and behave consistently [52, 236].”
- Flexible Neural Representation for Physics Prediction (2018, background): “Moreover, they either are born knowing, or quickly learn about, concepts such as object permanence, occlusion, and deformability, which guide their perception and reasoning [42].”
- Relational Neural Expectation Maximization: Unsupervised Discovery of Objects and their Interactions (2018, background): “This demonstrates a notion of object permanence and aligns with evidence that young infants seem to infer that occluded objects move in connected paths and continue to maintain objectspecific properties (Spelke, 1990).”
- A Compositional Object-Based Approach to Learning Physical Dynamics (2016, background): “For example, a foundational sense of intuitive physics is a prior that guides humans to decompose a scene into objects and carry expectations of object boundaries and motion across different scenarios (Spelke, 1990).”
- Unmasking Clever Hans predictors and assessing what machines really learn (2019, background): “A major difference between machine and human learning is that humans (even infants) are equipped with a “start-up” software [62, 63] consisting of a priori representation about objects and physics [64,65] and about other agents [66,67].”
- Automatically Composing Representation Transformations as a Means for Generalization (2018, background): “…cognitive development: abstract structural priors serve as a scaffolding within which concrete, domain-specific learning takes place [63, 78], but domain-specific learning about the continuous semantics of the world can also provide feedback to update the more discrete structural priors…”
- Jointly Discovering Visual Objects and Spoken Words from Raw Sensory Input (2018, background): “stand speech and recognize objects in an extremely weakly supervised fashion, aided not by ground-truth annotations, but by observation, repetition, multi-modal context, and environmental interaction [1,2]. In this paper, we do not attempt to model the cognitive development of humans, but instead as”
- The Theoretical Foundations of Evolutionary Psychology (2015, background): “…systems for these two domains: a mind-reading system for inferring the mental states of people (which can be selectively impaired in autism; Baron-Cohen, 1995; Leslie & Thaiss, 1992) and an object mechanics system for understanding the interactions of inanimate objects (Leslie, 1994; Spelke, 1990).”
- Concepts and categories: Memory, meaning, and metaphysics (2012, background): “Learning in a given domain may be guided by certain skeletal principles, constraints, and (possibly innate) assumptions about the world (see Gelman & Coley, 1990; Gelman, 2003; Keil, 1981; Kellman & Spelke, 1983; Markman, 1990; Spelke, 1990).”
- Infants Attribute Value to the Goal-Directed Actions of Self-propelled Objects (1997, background): “Shown objects that deviate from these properties, infants will increase their looking time (Spelke, 1990).”
- Object Segmentation by Long Term Analysis of Point Trajectories (2010, background): “Biological vision systems learn objects up to a certain degree of accuracy in an unsupervised way by making use of the natural ordering of the images they see [1].”
- Climate, Culture, and the Evolution of Cognition (2000, background): “Sophisticated sense systems depend upon powerful, specialized innate algorithms to make useful information from a mass of raw data from the sensory transducers (Shettleworth, this volume, Spelke, 1990).”
- Conceptual precursors to language (2004, background): “Infants' sensitivity to this distinction is linked to representations of object mechanic”
- Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor's reach. (1998, background): “By 3 or 4 months of age, infants expect that two objects will not occupy the same space and that objects will exist and move continuously in time and space (Baillargeon, 1987, 1993; Spelke, 1990; Spelke et al., 1992).”