Market information in life cycle assessment

By Bo Pedersen Weidema. 2003

354 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2b0655763a78b9ebf78b548cc32af5c436e9907c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Yi Yang
2. Göran Finnveden
3. R. Plevin
4. T. Ekvall
5. Roland Geyer
6. Sangwon Suh
7. Michel Hauschild
8. Trevor Zink

Citations in the corpus

• The Integration of Economic and Social Aspects in Life Cycle Impact Assessment (2006, methodology): “The CBA technique has been improved by adopting advances in welfare theory and choice modelling (Bennet & Blamey 2001, Hanley et al. 2001), while the LCA technique has been adopting aspects of market theory (Weidema 2003) and the use of input-output matrices (Heijungs & Suh 2002).”
• The complexity and challenges of determining GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions from grid electricity consumption and conservation in LCA (life cycle assessment) – A methodological review (2011, background): “In general, Ekvall and Weidema [24] determined the identification of a marginal technology as a five step process.”
• Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. (2009, methodology): “Partial equilibrium analysis (Friedman, 1976; Weidema, 2003; Ekvall and Weidema, 2004; Lundie et al., 2007a) can quantify these effects in a consequential LCA, as demonstrated by Ekvall (2000), Ekvall and Andrae (2006), and Lesage et al. (2007a,b).”
• Stochastic and epistemic uncertainty propagation in LCA (2013, background): “Coal-fired power plants and natural gas-fired power plants were assumed as the marginal technologies for respectively electricity and heat production (Energistyrelsen 2011; Weidema et al. 1999; Weidema 2003).”
• Energy system analysis of marginal electricity supply in consequential LCA (2010, background): “A proper identification and delimitation of the analysed product system like the Danish energy system are seen as increasingly important to the outcome and quality of the LCA (Weidema 2003; Ekvall and Weidema 2004).”
• Lights and shadows in consequential LCA (2012, unknown): “…さらに、Guinée & Heijungs（2011）は最近、以上とは 別のLCAの様式を研究することの意義を示唆した。すな わち、バックキャスティングLCA（back-casting LCA: BLCA）である。これは、規範的な将来の目標に向けて、 特定の製品システムをモデル化するシナリオベースの方法 である。CLCAでは、CO2、土地利用、水や資源の利用な どに関する地球規模の結果（コンセクエンス）が、1つの 製品の視点からモデル化されている。CLCAは、意思決定 によって間接的に影響を受ける多くのプロセスへの影響の…”
• Circular Economy Rebound (2017, background): “Much of the scholarly, practitioner, and legislative efforts in the circular economy have therefore been spent trying to find and implement the best ways to increase secondary production, and to properly account for it in measurement methodologies such as life cycle assessment (LCA) (e.g., Atherton ”
• Life cycle inventory modelling of land use induced by crop consumption (2007, background): “This implies perfectly elastic supply or, in other words, increased consumption will be fully covered by increased production without any influence on prices or competing applications (Weidema 2003).”
• Common Misconceptions about Recycling (2016, background): “Only when the formal distinction between attributional and consequential LCA grew more widespread did the importance of market-mediated material substitutions become more recognized (see, e.g., Weidema 2003).”
• An Ecological Economic Critique of the Use of Market Information in Life Cycle Assessment Research (2011, background): “Although we do not here extend our formal critique of the use of market information to the practice of consequential LCA, we observe that, as the central purpose of this methodological variant is to model impacts that result as a consequence of our decisions (Weidema 2003), as mediated through bioph”
• LCA of biomass-based energy systems: A case study for Denmark (2012, background): “The indirect land use changes were estimated based on the assumption that expansion of willow cultivated land in Denmark replaced the marginal crop (spring barley) which had to be produced somewhere else if status quo was to be maintained [46,47].”