Energy system analysis of marginal electricity supply in consequential LCA
By Henrik Lund, Brian Vad Mathiesen, P. Christensen, Jannick H. Schmidt. 2010
192 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Environmental Engineering, Pollution
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5a2c8e26b29e00968c401fd113682f59765c6724
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- J. Kiviluoma
- Christian Bauer
- Reinout Heijungs
- Jeroen B. Guinée
- S. Soimakallio
- Johannes Hofer
- Laura Saikku
- Marco Miotti
In Environmental Engineering
- Jeroen B. Guinée
- Reinout Heijungs
- A. Zamagni
- Paolo Masoni
- A. Raggi
- Christian Bauer
- J. Kiviluoma
- S. Soimakallio
In Pollution
Citations in the corpus
- Integrated environmental and economic assessment of current and future fuel cell vehicles (2015, result): “The evaluation of such effects and relationships call for consequential LCAs, as opposed to the attributional approach used in this study (Lund et al. 2010; Earles and Halog 2011; Zamagni et al. 2012).”
- The complexity and challenges of determining GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions from grid electricity consumption and conservation in LCA (life cycle assessment) – A methodological review (2011, methodology): “The anticipated development of energy prices, quantity and profile of electricity consumption as well as climate policy are probably the most important market drivers of new investments in electricity production [9].”
- Lights and shadows in consequential LCA (2012, methodology): “2008), but are derived from economic models (e.g. Dalgaard et al. 2008; Eriksson et al. 2007; Lemoine et al. 2010; Lesage et al. 2007a, b; Lund et al. 2010; Pehnt et al. 2008) or outlooks in specific sectors (e.”