An Ecological Economic Critique of the Use of Market Information in Life Cycle Assessment Research

By Nathan Pelletier, P. Tyedmers. 2011

122 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0523eecbea7b9e59c414256c76cb22501f79915c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Engineering

1. N. Assen
2. Fulvio Ardente
3. André Bardow
4. Maurizio Cellura
5. Johannes Jung

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

1. Fulvio Ardente
2. Maurizio Cellura

Citations in the corpus

• Economic Allocation in Life Cycle Assessment (2012, background): “Weinzettel (2012) criticizes their position in a letter and Pelletier and Tyedmers (2012) provide a rebuttal in a responding letter.”
• Lights and shadows in consequential LCA (2012, unknown): “…後には、全ての製品がマーケットに含まれ、さまざまな要 因の中でも価格メカニズムが、それらの生産、開発および 消費を制御しているという理論がある。このように、一般 的な需要と供給のメカニズムは、それに従って反応するシ ステムの中に動きを生じ、因果関係の連鎖を生じさせる。 このようなマーケットの関係性やメカニズムは、現時点で はモデル（訳者註：LCAのモデル）の中から内生的には 導出されることはなく（Lundie et al. 2008）、経済モデル（例 えばDalgaard et al. 2008; Eriksson et al. 2010; Lemoine et al.…”
• Sensitivity coefficient-based uncertainty analysis for multi-functionality in LCA (2014, background): “(26) concerns economic allocation (Guinée et al. 2004): Economic allocation is sometimes criticized because economic allocation factors are derived from potentially fluctuating market prices (Ardente and Cellura 2012; Pelletier and Tyedmers 2011; Weinzettel 2012; Pelletier and Tyedmers 2012).”