Value of recreational fishing in the Brazilian Pantanal: a travel cost analysis using count data models

277 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

An evaluation of monetary and non-monetary techniques for assessing the importance of biodiversity and ecosystem services to people in countries with developing economies (2012, background): “, 2006; Nunes and van den Bergh, 2001), while revealed preference techniques are usually restricted to capturing use values only (Navrud and Mungatana, 1994; Shrestha et al., 2002).”
Not just minor forest products: The economic rationale for the consumption of wild food plants by subsistence farmers (2006, methodology): “This approach might be considered an extension of the travel cost method used by environmental economists to estimate the value of recreational fishing, for example (Shrestha et al., 2002).”
The Economic Value of Wetland Conservation and Creation: A Meta-Analysis (2008, unknown): “…of large valued sites, covering hundreds of thousands of hectares are the coastal wetlands of Louisiana (Gosselink et al., 1974), the Pantanal (Shrestha et al., 2002), the Everglades (Milon and Scrogin, 2006), the Sundarban in Bangladesh (Ahmad, 1984) and the Danube floodplain (Gren et al.,…”
Multi-attributed environmental index construction (2006, methodology): “Hedonic pricing (Goffe, 2000) and the travel-cost method ( Shrestha et al., 2002 ) are examples of these techniques.”