Child-care usage and mother-infant quality time

By C. Booth, K. Clarke-Stewart, D. Vandell, K. Mccartney, Margaret T. Owen. 2002

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2a13caccbdc11715e5b74160195f8d8e48862df1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

1. Lyn Craig
2. Holly Schiffrin
3. M. Liss

In Social Psychology

1. Holly Schiffrin
2. M. Liss
3. Lyn Craig
4. Haley A. Miles-McLean
5. Mindy J. Erchull

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Mindy J. Erchull
2. Lyn Craig
3. Holly Schiffrin
4. M. Liss
5. Abigail Powell

Citations in the corpus

• How Employed Mothers in Australia Find Time for Both Market Work and Childcare (2007, background): “Intriguingly, research also consistently shows that being employed or using non-parental childcare does not reduce parental childcare time on an hour for hour basis (Bianchi, 2000; Bittman, Craig, & Folbre, 2004; Booth, Clarke-Stewart, Vandell, McCartney, & Owen, 2002; Bryant & Zick, 1996a, b; Hof”
• Development and Validation of a Quantitative Measure of Intensive Parenting Attitudes (2012, background): “Other research determined that working mothers who perceived greater costs to maternal employment spent more time with their children on weekends (Booth et al. 2002).”