Negative genetic correlation for adult fitness between sexes reveals ontogenetic conflict in Drosophila.

By A. Chippindale, Jonathan R. Gibson, W. Rice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2001

619 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2a0796f8c65661ac6bd48a231504a3b594c8c3e6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Genetics

Citations in the corpus

New Answers for Old Questions: The Evolutionary Quantitative Genetics of Wild Animal Populations (2008, background): “Quantitative trait loci in Drosophila.”
Variation in immune defence as a question of evolutionary ecology (2003, background): “Generally, sexual selection is part of the life history, and correlated effects of sexual selection affect the sexes differentially (Chippindale et al. 2001).”
Nothing in Genetics Makes Sense Except in Light of Genomic Conflict (2013, background): “The extent of this discordance was documented when the same random, genome-wide sets of genes were cloned and then expressed in male and female D. melanogaster (Chippindale et al. 2001).”
Maternal allocation of androgens and antagonistic effects of yolk androgens on sons and daughters (2006, neutral): “…or daughters or both to deviate from the optimum because fitness benefits to parents mediated by the beneficial effects of relatively high levels of androgens to offspring of one sex will have to be traded against the detrimental effects on offspring of the other sex (Chippindale et al., 2001).”
The Contemporary Evolution of Fitness (2018, background): “Consequently, studies aimed at understanding the rate of evolution of fitness should estimate VAw in both sexes as well as the cross-sex additive genetic covariance (COVA) and hence correlation (rA) (Chippindale et al. 2001, Brommer et al. 2007, Kruuk et al. 2008, Kirkpatrick 2009).”
Intersexual ontogenetic conflict (2001, methodology): “1 4 ( 2 0 0 1 ) 6 8 5 ± 6 9 3 ã 2 0 0 1 B L A C K W E L L S C I E N C E L T D These 18 genomes were then assayed eight times independently for total ®tness in females (as described in Chippindale et al., 2001).”
The evolution of mutual ornamentation (2007, background): “Studies in Drosophila have shown substantial sexually antagonistic ﬁtness variation (Chippindale et al. 2001).”
The evolution of sex-biased genes and sex-biased gene expression (2007, background): “Experimental work in Drosophila species has confirmed the frequent genomic occurrence of sexually antagonistic alleles and has demonstrated their response to selectio”
Inbreeding depression of sexually selected traits and attractiveness in the zebra finch (2010, background): “For example, in Drosophila, Chippindale et al. (2001) cloned haploid genomes, expressed them in outbred males and females and measured adult reproductive success and offspring viability of these individuals.”
Multiple paternity and sperm storage lead to increased genetic diversity in Anolis lizards (2007, background): “Multiple paternity also allows females to produce a genetically diverse array of progeny, which may be a form of genetic bet-hedging, or a means to alleviate conflict in mating systems (Chippindale et al., 2001).”
Sexual conflict and life histories (2006, background): “However, as sexual maturity is approached, the best strategies for maximizing fitness diverge according to the sex of the individual, with males typically having a greater emphasis on achieving fertilizations (Chippindale et al. 2001; Rice & Chippindale 2001a, b).”