Intersexual ontogenetic conflict
By W. Rice, A. Chippindale. 2001
392 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9c8a8f2bdf91fdbb144ef17a6119888fa8b33f67
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Hanna Kokko
- R. Brooks
- Michael D. Jennions
- L. Kruuk
- Alastair J. Wilson
- N. Wedell
- J. Slate
- Audrey Coreau
In Genetics
- Hanna Kokko
- Alastair J. Wilson
- R. Brooks
- L. Kruuk
- Michael D. Jennions
- J. Slate
- Audrey Coreau
- Miguel A. Carretero
Citations in the corpus
- Head shape allometry and proximate causes of head sexual dimorphism in Podarcis lizards: joining linear and geometric morphometrics (2007, background): “…head height is inevitably modified as head size increases and the commonality of head dimensions–HS trajectories between sexes could be the result of anatomical and structural restrictions constraining cranium growth or genetic correlations between sexes (Lande, 1980; Rice & Chippindale, 2001).”
- Low dispersal ability and habitat specificity promote extinctions in rare but not in widespread species: the Orthoptera of Germany (2005, background): “Yet, even if sexual size dimorphism is not the cause of sexual selection it results in one form of it: intra-locus sexual conflict over body size (Rice and Chippindale 2001).”
- New Answers for Old Questions: The Evolutionary Quantitative Genetics of Wild Animal Populations (2008, background): “…with fitness (Figure 2a, with “environment” now referring to gender), or through opposing selection pressures (Figure 2b); both scenarios result in negative genetic correlations between male and female fitness, indicating intralocus conflict within genes affecting fitness (Rice & Chippindale 2001).”
- Sexual selection, sexual conflict and the evolution of ageing and life span (2008, background): “The result is intralocus sexual conflict , whereby evolution of a locus towards the sex-specific optimum is impeded by selection on the same locus in the opposite sex (Rice & Chippindale 2001; Arnqvist et al .”
- Sexual conflict and life histories (2006, background): “However, as sexual maturity is approached, the best strategies for maximizing fitness diverge according to the sex of the individual, with males typically having a greater emphasis on achieving fertilizations (Chippindale et al. 2001; Rice & Chippindale 2001a, b).”
- Sexually antagonistic selection on primate size (2002, background): “…larger context as examples of a sexually antagonistic intragenomic conflict where traits are advantageous for one sex, whilst detrimental for the other (Rice, 1992; Arnqvist, 1994; Arnqvist & Rowe, 1995; Rice & Holland, 1997; Holland & Rice, 1998; Brooks & Jennions, 1999; Rice & Chippindale, 2001).”
- The Developmental, Physiological, Neural, and Genetical Causes and Consequences of Frequency-Dependent Selection in the Wild (2006, background): “…Selection 589 THE ROLE OF COGNITION, PERCEPTION, AND INNATE SIGNALS IN FREQUENCY-DEPENDENT SELECTION Cognition constitutes three steps (Roitblat 1987): 1. perception—units of information are collected and stored, 2. processing—this data, stored in memory, is analyzed with…”
- The evolution of mate choice and mating biases (2003, background): “This may have arisen because there is strong selection on females for wider hips, to reduce mortality during childbirth, while wider hips reduce male fitness because they decrease running efficiency (Rice & Chippindale 2001).”
- Female polymorphisms, sexual conflict and limits to speciation processes in animals (2007, positive): “We have suggested that such incomplete sexlimitation could potentially fuel an intersexual ontogenetic sexual conflict (Rice and Chippindale 2001) between alleles for male protandry and the morph-locus which affects development time in both males and females (Abbott and Svensson 2005).”
- Maternal age affects offspring lifespan of the seed beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus (2003, result): “Sex differences in gene expression are common (Rice & Chippindale 2001; Nuzhdin et al. 1997; Nuzhdin & Reiwitch 2002) and consistent with the generally low genetic correlation observed between male and female lifespan in C. maculatus (rA = 0·70 in this study; rA = 0·78 and 0·84 in two other…”