Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Data to Estimate the Nonmarket Value of Ecological Services: An Assessment of the State of the Science

293 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Hedonic Price Effects of Pedestrian- and Transit-Oriented Development (2011, methodology): “In contrast to RP, SP methods use assertions of preference, usually derived from public surveys, to gauge, ex ante, willingness to pay for a good (Whitehead et al. 2008).”
Handling respondent uncertainty in Choice Experiments: Evaluating recoding approaches against explicit modelling of uncertainty (2009, background): “…stressed repeatedly in studies investigating the merits of joint analysis of Stated Preference and Revealed Preference data (Bradley and Daly, 1994; Hensher and Bradley, 1993; Adamowicz et al., 1994; Adamowicz et al., 1997; Hensher et al., 1999; Brownstone et al., 2000, Whitehead et al., 2008).”
Valuation Techniques for Social Cost-Benefit Analysis: (2011, background): “Stated preference data can also help in isolating causal effects in hedonic market approaches, especially in trip cost methods for recreational sites (see Accent, 2010 and Whitehead et al., 2008 for a full discussion).”
Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part II. Macro-scale analysis of literature and effectiveness of bias mitigation methods (2021, methodology): “Whitehead et al. (2008) similarly pointed out that “Combining SP data with RP data grounds hypothetical choices with real choice behaviour” (p. 877) and that “Combination with RP data can be used to detect and mitigate hypothetical bias and validate SP methods” (p. 877).”