Allocation and competitiveness in the EU emissions trading scheme: policy overview
By Michael Grubb, Karsten Neuhoff. 2006
340 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/298bb248e0d64a58cde43295c0bbcc097d95c5bc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Citations in the corpus
- Emissions trading: lessons learnt from the 1st phase of the EU ETS and prospects for the 2nd phase (2006, background): “Thus, aiming for only marginal reductions against inflated projections is likely to result in over-allocation (Grubb and Neuhoff, 2006; Grubb and Ferrario, this issue).”
- Border adjustment for European emissions trading: Competitiveness and carbon leakage (2010, background): “Several potential measures have been identified, including international sectoral agreements, cost containment measures, free or outputbased allocation of allowances, and border adjustment measures (Grubb and Neuhoff, 2006; Houser et al., 2008).”
- EU emissions trading and the cement sector: a spatial competition analysis (2008, background): “Grubb and Neuhoff (2006) identify two criteria for assessing, as a first step, the degree to which the competitiveness of a particular industrial sector might be affected by the EU ETS.”
- Financing the civic energy sector: How financial institutions affect ownership models in Germany and the United Kingdom (2016, neutral): “However much energy research on financial 'institutions' focusses on the micro-economic institutions of market making tools and support regimes such as renewable energy subsidies [21], emissions trading mechanisms [22] and carbon pricing [23].”
- Abatement and Allocation in the Pilot Phase of the EU ETS (2009, methodology): “Such studies often use a version of the flow adjustment model from Houthakker, Verleger, and Sheehan (1974) where the dependent variable is the quantity of the variable of interest, and a lagged dependent variable, price, and other explanatory variables are on the right hand side of the equation.”
- Part I: Externalities and economic policies in road transport (2010, background): “The Albrecht (2001), Grubb and Neuhoff (2006) and UK DfT (2007b) highlight a number of points that need to be assessed and decided upon the introduction of a cap-and-trade system for CO2 emissions (in the road transport sector).”
- Auctioning of EU ETS phase II allowances: how and why? (2006, background): “Helm (2005). 6 A 2006 Special Issue of the Energy Policy Journal (34(8)) analyses the European experience with eco-taxation and points to deeper underlying issues about the degree of public understanding and trust in political processes. A Swedish survey also underlines that attitudes to carbon taxa”
- Strengthening of Korean residual soil with β-1,3/1,6-glucan biopolymer (2012, background): “The total economical price (direct material cost + indirect CO2 emission expense) for 1 ton of soil improvement then becomes $2848 for 10% cement mixture and $1576 for 0.49% b-1,3/1,6-glucan polymer treatment.”
- Price Floors for Emissions Trading (2010, positive): “Both price ceilings and price floors can reduce risk and price volatility in carbon markets, which has been of concern in the EU emissions trading system or ETS (Grubb and Neuhoff, 2006), and can thus make the introduction of ETS systems more acceptable.”
- The Brave New World of Carbon Trading (2009, methodology): “now look like illegal hidden subsidies ( Grubb and Neuhoff, 2006 ).”
- The Global Effects of Subglobal Climate Policies (2010, background): “25 The Global Effects of Subglobal Climate Policies Christoph Böhringer, Carolyn Fischer and Knut Einar Rosendahl∗”
- Investing in low-carbon transitions: energy finance as an adaptive market (2017, background): “…market incentive tools, such as renewable energy (RE) subsidies (Gross, Blyth, & Heptonstall, 2010; Wood & Dow, 2011), emissions trading mechanisms (Grubb & Neuhoff, 2006; Hintermann, 2010), and the relative merits of pricing carbon (Aldy & Stavins, 2012; Cetin & Verschuere, 2009; Ellerman,…”