Increased brain activity to infant-directed speech in 6-and 13-month-old infants.

By R. Zangl, D. Mills. 2007

120 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Does prosody make the difference? A meta-analysis on relations between prosodic aspects of infant-directed speech and infant outcomes. (2017, background): “Consistent with this notion, infants have also been found to show a higher cerebral activation during exposure to IDS than to ADS (Naoi et al., 2012; Zangl & Mills, 2007).”
Beyond babytalk: Re-evaluating the nature and content of speech input to preverbal infants (2007, background): “Other studies which suggest a 3 However, there is evidence for differential brain activity in 13-month-olds (as well as 6-month-olds) between ID and AD speech (Zangl & Mills, 2007).”
Quantifying Sources of Variability in Infancy Research Using the Infant-Directed-Speech Preference (2020, result): “Finally, infants show increased neural activity in response to familiar words in IDS compared with the same words in ADS, and also compared with unfamiliar words in either register (Zangl & Mills, 2007).”