Ethical Decision Making in Software Piracy: Initial Development and a Test of a Four-Component Model

By Trevor T. Moores, Jerry Cha-Jan Chang. MIS Q., 2006

359 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

What levels of moral reasoning and values explain adherence to information security rules? An empirical study (2009, methodology): “In the field of IS, the scenario method has been used to study ethical issues, such as software piracy (Moores & Chang, 2006), computer abuse (Harrington, 1996; Banerjee et al ., 1998; D’Arcy et al ., 2009), and privacy concerns (Malhotra et al ., 2004).”
Counterfeit proneness: Conceptualisation and scale development (2011, positive): “Moores & Chang, 2006 ) or Hunt and Vitell's ( 1986 ) ethical decision-making model (e.”
Privacy Concerns Versus Desire for Interpersonal Awareness in Driving the Use of Self-Disclosure Technologies: The Case of Instant Messaging in Two Cultures (2011, methodology): “-only and China-only path models, we used the established approach to multigroup comparisons in PlS as demonstrated in Moores and Chang [79].”