Demographics of Age: Generational and Cohort Confusion

By Johannes Markert. 2004

231 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/27fbe077046f565f827c24557e48ac3496f00ebd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

1. Jun Liu
2. M. Meeks
3. J. Eastman
4. Eric Lamm

In Gender Studies

1. Jun Liu
2. M. Meeks
3. J. Eastman
4. Eric Lamm

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Jun Liu
2. M. Meeks
3. J. Eastman
4. Eric Lamm

Citations in the corpus

• Workplace fun: the moderating effects of generational differences (2009, background): “Generational theory assumes that while we can generalise cohort differences, it is not a completely objective or absolute differentiation ( Markert, 2004”
• The generation of virtual needs: Recipes for satisfaction in social media networking (2016, background): “The next step divides the data into the following generational cohorts: baby boomers (1946–1964), generation X (1965–1983), and millennials (1984–2002) (Elmore, 2014; Markert, 2004).”
• The impact of generational cohorts on status consumption: an exploratory look at generational cohort and demographics on status consumption (2012, background): “Markert (2004) notes problems with inconsistent use of dates to define generations and the use of the terms of generational and cohort interchangeably in the”