Evolutionary and Biomedical Insights from the Rhesus Macaque Genome

By Richard A. Gibbs, J. Rogers, Michael G. Katze, Roger E Bumgarner, George M. Weinstock, Elaine R. Mardis, K. Remington, R. Strausberg, J. Venter, Richard K. Wilson and 166 more. Science, 2007

1,385 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Estimating gene gain and loss rates in the presence of error in genome assembly and annotation using CAFE 3. (2013, background): “Genome sequencing projects have revealed large and frequent changes between species in the size of gene families (e.g., Gibbs et al. 2004, 2007; Drosophila 12 Genomes Consortium 2007; Li et al. 2009; Floudas et al. 2012).”
Natural selection on genes that underlie human disease susceptibility. (2008, methodology): “sus macaque [24], kindly provided by Adam Seipel at Cornell University.”
Assemblathon 2: evaluating de novo methods of genome assembly in three vertebrate species (2013, methodology): “Combining multiple assemblies from different assembly pipelines in order to produce an improved assembly was an approach used in the assembly of the rhesus macaque genome [66].”