Estimating gene gain and loss rates in the presence of error in genome assembly and annotation using CAFE 3.

By Mira V. Han, Gregg W. C. Thomas, Jose Lugo-Martinez, Matthew W. Hahn. Molecular biology and evolution, 2013

776 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Genetics, Molecular Biology, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e80aae6d765820ee062eba9d2ac8e599fa63fb92

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

1. Edward L. Braun
2. Ludovic Antoine Alexandre Orlando
3. M. Springer
4. Mikkel Schubert
5. J. Fjeldså
6. M. W. Bruford
7. C. Rahbek
8. I. Sanmartín

In Molecular Biology

1. Eske Willerslev
2. Edward L. Braun
3. Ludovic Antoine Alexandre Orlando
4. M. Springer
5. Mikkel Schubert
6. J. Fjeldså
7. Yang Liu
8. Jiang Hu

In Plant Science

1. Edward L. Braun
2. M. Springer
3. Yang Liu
4. C. Rahbek

Citations in the corpus

• Comparative genomics reveals insights into avian genome evolution and adaptation (2014, methodology): “As input for the CAFE 3 program (134, 135), we used ultrametric trees based on the well-resolved phylogenies of birds (the TENT tree in (5)) and eutherian mammals (136).”