Effects of cybersex addiction on the family: Results of a survey
By J. Schneider. 2000
277 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/27e709788168a3302a983b811c87ad96a7ef2ce0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Mark D. Griffiths
- Brian H. Spitzberg
- Jill C. Manning
- J. Schneider
- Katherine M. Hertlein
- F. Piercy
- David L. Delmonico
- Al Cooper
In Gender Studies
- Mark D. Griffiths
- Jill C. Manning
- J. Schneider
- Brian H. Spitzberg
- Katherine M. Hertlein
- F. Piercy
- David L. Delmonico
- Al Cooper
In Social Psychology
- Mark D. Griffiths
- Jill C. Manning
- Brian H. Spitzberg
- Apostolos Kiohos
- Christos C. Frangos
- Katherine M. Hertlein
- Gregory Hoobler
- F. Piercy
Citations in the corpus
- Pornography Viewing among Fraternity Men: Effects on Bystander Intervention, Rape Myth Acceptance and Behavioral Intent to Commit Sexual Assault (2011, background): “…(c) an increase in the belief that sexual satisfaction can be obtained without affection or emotional attachment (Manning, 2006); (d) an increase in the belief that relationships are sexually confining (Zillman, 2000); and, (e) a decrease of interest in monogamy and child rearing (Schneider, 2000).”
- The Impact of Internet Pornography on Marriage and the Family: A Review of the Research (2006, background): “What cannot be determined, however, is what comes first—does Internet pornography influence unfaithful behavior or does unfaithful behavior coincide with preexisting traits that predispose someone to normalize Internet pornography viewing? At least three studies support the fact that women view cybe”
- Cyberstalking and the technologies of interpersonal terrorism (2002, background): “The review that follows will contextualize cyberstalking by framing it within the current state of knowledge on stalking in general.”
- Internet sex addiction: A review of empirical research (2012, methodology): “Delmonico and Miller (2003) surveyed 6088 participants (of which 5005 were male) seeking help for SA in the USA.”
- Internet Infidelity: A Critical Review of the Literature (2006, background): “In cases of Internet infidelity, the involved partner can carry on the relationship in secrecy by rapidly closing chat windows being used, deleting transcripts, and purging e-mail boxes (Schneider, 2000a).”
- Online Sexual Problems: Assessment and Predictive Variables (2001, background): “Schneider (2000) reported that 34% of the partners in her sample had a decreased interest in sexual activity with their partner.”
- A Qualitative Study of Cybersex Participants: Gender Differences, Recovery Issues, and Implications for Therapists (2000, methodology): “METHODS To learn about the perceived effects of cybersex involvement on the user, I employed the same qualitative research method used in the previous study of the effects of cybersex addiction on the partner (Schneider, 2000).”
- Internet Addiction among Greek University Students: Demographic Associations with the Phenomenon, Using the Greek Version of Young's Internet Addiction Test (2010, background): “This has been readily described in studies of online infidelity and cybersex experiences (Schneider, 2000).”
- Preliminary Development of a Model and Measure of Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) Competence (2006, unknown): “…facilitate Internet addiction, especially cybersex addiction (Brenner, 1997; Cooper, Delmonico, & Burg, 2000; Davis, 2001; Griffiths, 1999, 2001; McGrath & Casey, 2002; Morahan-Martin & Schu-macher, 2000; Pratarelli, Browne, & Johnson, 1999; Schneider, 2000; Schwartz & Southern, 2000; Suler, 1999).”
- Sex on the internet: Observations and implications for internet sex addiction (2001, unknown): “2000; Schwartz & Southern, 2000) and indirect (e.g., Orzack & Ross, 2000; Schneider, 2000) studies.”