Long- and short-term state-dependent foraging under predation risk: an indication of habitat quality

By Ola Olsson, Joel s. Brown, Henrik G. Smith. 2002

109 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/27e6e7fa284e8ca1021216a6e761c309a3dafe4e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. W. Cresswell
2. Johan Lind
3. T. Piersma
4. Burt P. Kotler
5. C. Lindell
6. Joel s. Brown
7. J. Gils
8. Will Figueira

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Burt P. Kotler
2. T. Piersma
3. J. Gils
4. W. Cresswell
5. Johan Lind
6. C. Lindell
7. Will Figueira
8. Joel s. Brown

Citations in the corpus

• Beyond the information centre hypothesis: communal roosting for information on food, predators, travel companions and mates? (2010, background): “The figure is taken from Piersma et al. (1993b). The arrows show red knot tidal movements during incoming and outgoing tides.”
• Changes in fox squirrel anti-predator behaviors across the urban–rural gradient (2009, background): “Across the urban–rural gradient (and in all landscapes) animals make behavioral choices to balance the risks of predation with the risks of starvation (Brown 1999; Brown et al. 1999; Olsson et al. 2002 ).”
• Complex habitats may not always benefit prey: linking visual field with reef fish behavior and distribution (2007, background): “Altogether, 5 fish were recorded in each of the habitats (fore and back reefs) in the pre-spawning period (20 to 26 August 2001), which was determined from the moon phase (Robertson et al. 1988).”
• Hazardous duty pay and the foraging cost of predation (2004, background): “Olsson et al. (2002) compared in aviaries the GUDs of starlings from a good environment (high reproductive success, F ) with those from a poor environment.”
• Determining the fitness consequences of antipredation behavior (2005, background): “…giving-up density works well for certain questions in predation is that it is a multivariate statistic that distils an entire vector of behaviors and decisions into a single scalar output that can be measured under diverse conditions and with animals with different states (see Olsson et al., 2002).”
• The Value of Animal Behavior in Evaluations of Restoration Success (2008, background): “Thus, there are strong links between behavior, habi- tat quality, and potential fitness (Olsson et al. 2002).”