The Value of Animal Behavior in Evaluations of Restoration Success

By C. Lindell. 2008

82 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/82e8f32fb98742c3cdf6556a6fa73acc06e74274

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. O. Berger‐Tal
2. R. Hale
3. David Saltz
4. Tal Polak
5. Burt P. Kotler
6. Y. Lubin
7. S. Swearer
8. Aya Oron

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. O. Berger‐Tal
2. R. Hale
3. David Saltz
4. Tal Polak
5. Burt P. Kotler
6. Y. Lubin
7. S. Swearer
8. Aya Oron

Citations in the corpus

• Integrating animal behavior and conservation biology: a conceptual framework (2010, methodology): “2) Behavioral indicators used to monitor the effectiveness of management programs, or evaluate the success of a management program at its early stages, before population or ecosystem-level responses are evident (e.g., Ikuta and Blumstein 2003; Lindell 2008).”
• When good animals love bad restored habitats: how maladaptive habitat selection can constrain restoration (2017, background): “2005), requiring that restored sites have a net reproductive rate greater than one (Lindell 2008).”