Micromachined metal oxide gas sensors: opportunities to improve sensor performance
By Isolde Simon, Nicolae Barsan, Michael Bauer, Udo Weimar. 2001
648 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Bioengineering, Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/27e3cbeb8add0cf7766b928b6eb4fdfbd1c6f50e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Bioengineering
In Biomedical Engineering
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Kourosh Kalantar-Zadeh
- Michael S. Strano
- Florin Udrea
- Gary Rosengarten
- B. Hashemi
- K. Janghorban
- A. Zettl
- Serge Zhuiykov
Citations in the corpus
- Metal-core@metal oxide-shell nanomaterials for gas-sensing applications: a review (2015, background): “Therefore, one needs cheaper, smaller, and more user-friendly gas-sensing devices (Simon et al. 2001).”
- Fast response integrated MEMS microheaters for ultra low power gas detection (2015, background): “However, convenional SMO sensors usually operate at 300 ◦C or higher, requiring undreds of milliwatts of power consumption per sensor [2].”
- Tungsten-Based SOI Microhotplates for Smart Gas Sensors (2008, methodology): “TABLE II MATERIAL PROPERTIES USED IN THE SIMULATIONS (TAKEN FROM [1], [12], [35], AND [36])”
- Metal-Organic Frameworks for Sensing Applications in the Gas Phase (2009, neutral): “[28] or [29], respectively.”
- Transition metal oxides – Thermoelectric properties (2013, methodology): “In such sensors, a variation in the generated voltages induced due to the Seebeck effect in TE materials are used to assess the sensor performance[383].”