Democracy and Development: List of Tables and Figures

By A. Przeworski, Michael E. Álvarez, J. A. Cheibub, F. Limongi. 2000

390 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/279aff6c256cb23db2397df39dc49938367e6624

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Development

Citations in the corpus

Economic and Social Factors Driving the Third Wave of Democratization (2008, neutral): “The Supplementary Appendix Table 1 also compares our classification with the Przeworski et al. (1996, 2000) categorization, the Freedom House trichotomous regime split, and the Polity measure when we use the median value of the index (i.e. zero) to distinguish democratic and autocratic regimes.”
Natural Resources and Economic Growth: The Role of Investment (2006, background): “8 The civil liberties index is an average for the years 1972–1990 and is taken from Przeworski et al. (2000). The index ranges from 1 (full civil liberties) to 7 (negligible civil liberties).”
Which Democracies Will Last? Coups, Incumbent Takeovers, and the Dynamic of Democratic Consolidation (2014, neutral): “17 Boix and Rosato 2001; Cheibub and Gandhi 2005; Przeworski et al. 2000.”
A Closer Look at Oil, Diamonds, and Civil War (2006, background): “Negative shocks are also linked to the fall of authoritarian governments, which could also lead to the rise of separatism (Przeworski et al. 2000; Acemoglu et al., unpublished manuscript.).”
Workers of the World, Unite! Franchise Extensions and the Threat of Revolution in Europe, 1820-1938 (2014, background): “…democratization can, in principle, preempt revolution by granting conces- 14 composite measures of democratization, such as those proposed by Przeworski et al. (2000) or Boix (2003) and used extensively in research on the causes of democratic change during the third wave of…”
Development as institutional change: The pitfalls of monocropping and the potentials of deliberation (2004, background): “Przeworski and Limongi (1993) and Przeworski et al. (2000) also argue that having a political regime with regular electoral succession is neutral with respect to growth.”
Democracy, Autocracy, and Expropriation of Foreign Direct Investment (2009, methodology): “As noted earlier, the dichotomous measure of regime type is from the work of Alvarez et al. (1996) and Przeworski et al. (1996, 2000), coded 1 for democracy and 0 for autocracy.”
Foreign Aid and Regime Change: A Role for Donor Intent (2011, neutral): “Dependent Variables For the dependent variable, I follow Ross (2009) and use the dichotomous measure of democracy as coded by Przeworski et al. (2000), and most recently updated by Cheibub et al. (2010) to code transitions to democracy or autocracy as appropriate. According to these sources, a regim”
Economic Transformation and its Political Discontents in China: Authoritarianism, Unequal Growth, and the Dilemmas of Political Development (2006, background): “SOCIAL POLARIZATION AND THE CHALLENGE TO POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT From the perspective of democratization theory, China’s sharply growing inequality bodes ill for the prospects of democratization (Boix 2003, Przeworski et al. 2000).”
Resource Wealth and Political Regimes in Africa (2004, result): “This argument is consistent with the finding of Przeworski et al. (2000) on the link between economic development and democratic breakdown.”