Ecological correlates of endozoochory by herbivores

By R. Pakeman, G. Digneffe, J. Small. 2002

271 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/278d0e6dc5f0f4c3104bbb48b54a6af5ac709906

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Consistency of plant species and trait responses to grazing along a productivity gradient: a multi‐site analysis (2004, background): “However, attribute data for this trait are largely based on morphology, and field data suggest that this attribute is shared by many species with no morphological adaptation for this type of dispersal (Pakeman et al. 2002b).”
Impact of different-sized herbivores on recruitment opportunities for subordinate herbs in grasslands (2003, background): “Large seeds are more sensitive to physical damage by chewing than small seeds, the effect being stronger in smaller herbivores (Pakeman et al. 1999).”
Ecosystem and competition impacts of introduced deer (2008, unknown): “The role of deer and other ungulates as endozoo-chorous seed dispersers is now increasingly recognised (Malo and Suare 1995; Pakeman et al. 2002; Myers et al. 2004), with dispersal by deer implicated in long-distance plant dispersal (Myers et al. 2004).”
Germination success of temperate grassland species after passage through ungulate and rabbit guts (2005, background): “The unexpected positive relationship (e.g. Janzen 1984; Pakeman et al. 2002) of seed shape and seed mass with germination success must be interpreted within the context of this experiment, i.”
Endozoochorous seed dispersal by cattle and horse in a spatially heterogeneous landscape (2005, background): “When adding the knowledge on endozoochorically dispersed plant species from other studies e.g. Welch (1985); Malo and Suárez (1995); Dai (2000) and Pakeman et al. (2002), a still larger fraction of plant species are candidates for this mode of dispersal (41%).”
Dispersal potential in plant communities depends on environmental conditions (2004, background): “2000; Tackenberg 2001), Ken Thompson (University of Sheffield) for seed weight data, Ger Boedeltje (University of Nijmegen) and Rudy van Diggelen (University of Groningen) for unpublished data on floating capacity, Robin Pakeman (Macaulay Institute, Aberdeen) for data on endozoochory by mammals (Pak”
The Ecology of Seeds: References (2005, background): “In a study of ten British sites, Pakeman et al. (2002) found that seeds of 37% of the 98 species growing at the sites were also present in either sheep or rabbit dung.”
Plant dispersal syndromes are unreliable, especially for predicting zoochory and long‐distance dispersal (2021, background): “Endozoochory by large wild and domestic herbivores is well studied in Europe, e.g. in dehesas (Malo and Suárez 1995), grasslands (Pakeman et al. 2002) or deciduous forests (Heinken et al. 2002).”