Dispersal potential in plant communities depends on environmental conditions

By W. Ozinga, Renée M. Bekker, J. Schaminée, J. V. van Groenendael. 2004

216 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/55a93077b40f25fdc09e6b142054edfc2a16552d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. Loïc Pellissier
2. Antoine Guisan
3. Petr Pyšek
4. P. Vittoz
5. I. Kühn
6. J. Funk
7. J. Larson
8. Robert Biedermann

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Milan Chytrý
2. Petr Pyšek
3. A. Helm
4. I. Kühn
5. J. Larson
6. J. Funk
7. Antoine Guisan
8. Zdeňka Lososová

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Petr Pyšek
2. Milan Chytrý
3. A. Green
4. Loïc Pellissier
5. A. Helm
6. A. Brochet
7. I. Kühn
8. L. Tichý

Citations in the corpus

• Plant dispersal syndromes are unreliable, especially for predicting zoochory and long‐distance dispersal (2021, background): “Recent reviews often recognize that NFF plants can be dispersed by mammalian endozooch-ory, while failing to acknowledge avian vectors (Ozinga et al. 2004, Cousens et al. 2008).”
• How did this snail get here? Several dispersal vectors inferred for an aquatic invasive species (2013, background): “The ability to be carried by more than one vector is likely to increase the dispersal success of species (Ozinga et al., 2004) and may explain the invasive potential of alien species (e.”
• Dispersal traits determine plant response to habitat connectivity in an urban landscape (2011, background): “Instead we calculated average Ellenberg values which often show a close correlation with corresponding measurements of environmental variables (Schaffers and Sykora 2000) and have proven suitable to assess local environmental habitat conditions (Ozinga et al. 2004; Verheyen et al. 2004).”
• Patterns of plant traits in annual vegetation of man-made habitats in central Europe (2006, methodology): “Recent compilations of large databases of vegetation plot samples (‘phytosociological relevés’) (Ewald, 2001; Hennekens and Schaminée, 2001) and plant traits (e.g. Klotz et al., 2002) have facilitated analyses of plant trait patterns across different habitats (Ozinga et al., 2004b).”
• Chasing the unknown: predicting seed dispersal mechanisms from plant traits (2010, background): “Species that use epizoochory or attachment for dispersal typically are low-growing species, common in grassland or high-light environments (Hughes et al. 1994; Ozinga et al. 2004).”
• Plant functional connectivity – integrating landscape structure and effective dispersal (2017, unknown): “We describe these separately below, although the majority of plant species can be dispersed by multiple vectors (Ozinga et al. 2004).”
• Importance of regional species pools and functional traits in colonization processes: predicting re-colonization after large-scale destruction of ecosystems (2008, background): “Site conditions typical of pioneer stands, such as open space (increasing light availability) and nutrient deficiency (decreasing nitrogen availability), proved to be important factors for the colonization of adapted species (Hypothesis 3) (Ozinga et al. 2004; Rehounková & Prach 2006).”
• Regeneration: an overlooked aspect of trait‐based plant community assembly models (2016, background): “For example, Ozinga et al. (2004) found that light and moisture gradients were linked to dominant dispersal syndromes across 123 plant communities, while Copeland & Harrison (2015) similarly found that species found in mesic and xeric microclimates of a single region tended to exhibit water- and…”
• Plant traits co-vary with altitude in grasslands and forests in the European Alps (2010, background): “However, wind is recognised as the dominant vector in grasslands in general, whereas zoochory (especially by birds and ants) is more common in forests (e.g. Willson et al. 1990; Ozinga et al. 2004).”
• Darkness visible: reflections on underground ecology (2005, unknown): “The heterogeneity of soil means that metapopulation ideas are necessary, or even metacom-munity or metaecosystem approaches (Wilson 1992; Ozinga et al .”
• Prospects for fen meadow restoration on severely degraded fens (2010, background): “, 2006a) as well as been predicted from trait analyses (Ozinga et al., 2004; Van den Broek et al., 2005; Soons and Ozinga, 2005).”
• Seed dispersal by dabbling ducks: an overlooked dispersal pathway for a broad spectrum of plant species (2016, background): “2012), this mode of dispersal receives little or no mention in general reviews of dispersal by animals or in overviews of dispersal syndromes (e.g. Wang & Smith 2002; Ozinga et al. 2004; McConkey et al. 2012; Hintze et al. 2013), and there is an implicit assumption in the literature that waterbirds ”
• How important is long‐distance seed dispersal for the regional survival of plant species? (2005, background): “The vegetation-specific results are likely caused by interactions between environmental conditions and plant traits (Ozinga et al., 2004).”
• Grassland diversity related to the Late Iron Age human population density (2007, background): “Arrival of plant species into a particular community depends on the proximity of potential seed sources (Bruun 2000; Matlack 2005), the presence of dispersal vectors (Ozinga et al. 2004) and the permeability of the Correspondence: Meelis Pirtel (tel.”