Consistency of plant species and trait responses to grazing along a productivity gradient: a multi‐site analysis
By R. Pakeman. 2004
258 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Forestry, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/404ffbcbb48ff89481dc787ce9e7e4033c0bf426
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- Francesco de Bello
- J. Lepš
- Wilfried Thuiller
- S. Lavorel
- M. Sebastiá
- Michael Kleyer
- Stéphane Dray
- L. Firbank
In Forestry
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Francesco de Bello
- S. Lavorel
- J. Lepš
- R. Pakeman
- Eric Garnier
- Wilfried Thuiller
- M. Sebastiá
- Michael Kleyer
Citations in the corpus
- Large-scale changes in the abundance of common higher plant species across Britain between 1978, 1990 and 1998 as a consequence of human activity: Tests of hypothesised changes in trait representation (2005, methodology): “This may yield a sharper tool for identifying grazing impacts (Pakeman, 2004).”
- Differential responses of plant functional trait to grazing between two contrasting dominant C3 and C4 species in a typical steppe of Inner Mongolia, China (2011, background): “…traits response to grazing are largely mediated by resource availability (e.g., precipitation and soil nutrients) (Adler et al. 2004; Osem et al. 2004; Pakeman 2004; Vesk et al. 2004) and grazing intensity or evolutionary history of grazing (Adler et al. 2004; Díaz et al. 2007; Graff et al. 2007).”
- Predictive value of plant traits to grazing along a climatic gradient in the Mediterranean (2005, methodology): “Traits, including quantitative traits, were all categorized by means of fuzzy coding, to account for species’ variability for a given trait and to handle similar variables (Kleyer 1995; Pakeman 2004 ).”
- Sampling plant functional traits: What proportion of the species need to be measured? (2007, background): “…traits and vegetation dynamics (e.g. Lavorel et al. 1997; Lavorel & Garnier 2002), responses to disturbance (e.g. Lavorel et al. 1998) or grazing (e.g. Pakeman 2004) and ecosystem function (e.g. Cornelissen & Thompson 1997; Díaz et al. 2004; Hooper & Vitousek 1997; Lavorel & Garnier 2002).”
- The cascading impacts of livestock grazing in upland ecosystems : a 10-year experiment (2015, background): “While some degree of positive feedback between ungulate grazing and grazing tolerant plant communities exists (Augustine and McNaughton 1998, Pakeman 2004, Diaz et al. 2007), our results suggest that the net removal of plant biomass by livestock exceeds this positive feedback, permanently affecting…”
- A New Approach for Tracking Vegetation Change after Restoration: A Case Study with Peatlands (2013, methodology): “PRC have been used in different ecosystems to evaluate changes in vegetation assemblages following disturbances (Pakeman 2004; Vandvik et al. 2005; Palik & Kastendick 2010).”
- Assessing species and community functional responses to environmental gradients: which multivariate methods? (2012, methodology): “With increasing availability of trait data, the methodological challenge of linking species and community trait responses to the environment has gained prominence (Legendre et al. 1997), and in spite of many years of debate, it remains an open question (Pakeman 2004; Dray & Legendre 2008).”
- Relative climatic, edaphic and management controls of plant functional trait signatures (2009, background): “…to be modulated by information from climate (e.g. de Bello et al. 2005) or productivity (including both fertility and soil moisture effects, e.g. Pakeman 2004) in order to provide predictive capabilities when linking changes in management to vegetation dynamics or changes in ecosystem function.”
- Factors and processes affecting plant biodiversity in permanent grasslands. A review (2011, unknown): “20 03 S ee d ex po rt at io n w ith ha y regeneration by seeds; flowering and seed dispersal early in the season; rosette habit; higher light requirements; and lower minimum height (Pakeman 2004).”
- Grazing alters insect visitation networks and plant mating systems (2014, unknown): “Grazing and trampling by herbivores, such as cattle, can reduce the cover of competitively dominant plant species to create germination niches in the sward (Pakeman 2004).”
- Plant functional traits in studies of vegetation changes in response to grazing and mowing: towards a use of more specific traits (2008, result): “Despite the first encouraging results (Díaz et al. 2001), the same traits do not consistently indicate species’ responses to grazing under different environmental conditions (Vesk et al. 2004a, Osem et al. 2004, Pakeman 2004, de Bello et al. 2005).”
- Root functional parameters along a land‐use gradient: evidence of a community‐level economics spectrum (2015, background): “…agricultural fields) have leaf traits consistent with a resource acquisition strategy and fast growth rates, whereas abandonment of agricultural fields led to an increase in slow-growing species with a resource conservation strategy (Bazzaz 1996; Garnier et al. 2004; Pakeman 2004; Reich 2014).”
- Prospects for fen meadow restoration on severely degraded fens (2010, background): “an important driver of community assembly (Grime, 2002; Pakeman, 2004; Van Diggelen et al., 2005; Garnier et al., 2007).”
- Response diversity determines the resilience of ecosystems to environmental change (2013, background): “In rangelands, livestock grazing selectively affects those plant species that have relatively high palatability (Pakeman, 2004).”
- Impact of Transgenic VIP3A × Cry1Ab Lepidopteran-resistant Field Corn on the Nontarget Arthropod Community (2005, background): “…environmental stresses (Cuppen et al. 2000, Leonard et al. 2000, Smit et al. 2002, CandolÞ et al. 2003, Dively and Rose 2003, Heegaard and Vandvik 2004, Hense et al. 2004, Koolhaas et al. 2004, Pakeman 2004, Naranjo 2005, Prasifka et al. 2005, Torres and Ruberson 2005, Whitehouse et al. 2005).”