The impact of food prices on consumption: a systematic review of research on the price elasticity of demand for food.

By T. Andreyeva, M. Long, K. Brownell. American Journal of Public Health, 2010

1,175 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Marketing, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/26c3c93c8ceb7dfa6c6d7a5b7ffe275670883ac2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. E. Röös
2. M. Patel
3. Jan M. Bauer
4. Pete Smith
5. Georgia Perakis
6. Maxime C. Cohen
7. T. Garnett
8. Ruben Lobel

In Marketing

1. Georgia Perakis
2. Maxime C. Cohen
3. Ruben Lobel
4. L. Reisch

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

1. Jan M. Bauer
2. Pete Smith
3. Lisa M. Powell
4. Georgia Perakis
5. Maxime C. Cohen
6. T. Garnett
7. Ruben Lobel
8. L. Reisch

Citations in the corpus

• Do healthier foods and diet patterns cost more than less healthy options? A systematic review and meta-analysis (2013, background): “Our results indicate that lowering the price of healthier diet patterns — on average ∼ $1.50/day 24 – 26 It remains an open question as to why healthier diets cost more.”
• Greedy or needy? Land use and climate impacts of food in 2050 under different livestock futures (2017, background): “…what extent, and with what other potentially negative effects, is still highly uncertain since schemes in most countries have only been operating for a short period, and modelling studies have their limitations (Andreyeva et al., 2010; Eyles et al., 2012; Niebylski et al., 2015; Thow et al., 2010).”
• CONSUMPTION PATTERNS OF SUGAR SWEETENED BEVERAGES IN THE UNITED STATES (2013, background): “These recent increases in average prices of soda may have helped to level off or dampen demand among the US population; indeed, evidence shows that higher soft drink and SSB prices are related to lower consumption.(32,33) However, our study did not answer why changes in SSB consumption occurred.”
• The Impact of Demand Uncertainty on Consumer Subsidies for Green Technology Adoption (2016, positive): “, Arifoğlu et al. 2012, Mamani et al. 2012, Taylor and Xiao 2014). Arifoğlu et al. (2012) study the impact of yield uncertainty, in a model that represents both supply and demand, on the inefficiency in the influenza vaccine supply chain. They show that the equilibrium demand can be greater than the”
• Behavioural Insights and (Un)healthy Dietary Choices: a Review of Current Evidence (2018, background): “This is a potentially effective approach, as studies find the demand to be price-elastic (Afshin et al. 2017; An 2013; Andreyeva et al. 2010; Eyles et al. 2012; Maniadakis et al. 2013; Powell and Chaloupka 2009; Powell et al. 2013).”
• Eating out of home and its association with dietary intake: a systematic review of the evidence (2012, background): “As shown recently, foods OH have a particular high price elasticity compared to other foods and drinks (43).”