The social identity perspective in intergroup relations: Theories, themes and controversies

By J. Turner, Katherine J. Reynolds. 2008

390 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/26bc07a3be90794def7ebaaa1e049c2e364a66e3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Living in a multicultural world: Intergroup ideologies and the societal context of intergroup relations (2014, methodology): “Consistent with social identity theory (Tajfel & Turner, 1986) and self-categorisation theory (Turner & Reynolds, 2001; Turner, 1987), people can react quite defensively when their identity as members of a group is not acknowledged or recognised.”
SOCIAL IDENTITY IN INDUSTRIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY: CONCEPTS, CONTROVERSIES AND CONTRIBUTIONS (2006, background): “In sum, we argue that it is important to consider social identity as a grand theory, but not because we feel it should always be addressed in its full complexity or because the theory has some special ‘sovereignty’ (Turner & Reynolds, 2001).”
Sociopsychological Foundations of Intractable Conflicts (2007, background): “The formation of social identity is based on a selfcategorization process in which individuals group themselves cognitively as belonging to the same social category, in contrast to some other classes of collectives (Turner & Reynolds, 2001).”
Religious Group Identification and Inter-Religious Relations: A Study Among Turkish-Dutch Muslims (2007, background): “In addition, Turner (1999; see also McGarty, 2001; Turner & Reynolds, 2001) has criticized the idea of a simple positive correlation between identifi cation and in-group favouritism because SIT argues that in-group favouritism is a function of, for example, status positions and beliefs about the…”
The presence of the past: Identity continuity and group dynamics (2015, methodology): “Theoretically, our research is guided by the social identity perspective (Turner & Reynolds, 2001; see Spears, 2011, for a recent review) and motivated identity construction theory (Vignoles, 2011).”
The Impact of Self-Congruity and Evaluation of the Place on WOM: Perspectives of Tourism Destination Residents (2021, background): “…identity theory, people tend to classify themselves and others into various social categories, which enables the individual to locate or define himself or herself in the social environment, to a salient group classification (Stryker and Serpe 1994; Tajfel and Turner 1986; Turner and Reynolds 2001).”
Multicultural recognition and ethnic minority rights: A social identity perspective (2006, background): “It argues for the interaction between people’s collective psychology as group members and their beliefs about the nature of social groups, and the collective theories and ideologies about the social system (Turner, 1999; Turner & Reynolds, 2001).”
Disparagement humor: A theoretical and empirical review of psychoanalytic, superiority, and social identity theories (2008, background): “…categorize one’s self as a member of those groups (Tajfel and Turner 1986), the social identity that becomes salient depends largely on which categorizations are relevant in a given context — individuals self-categorize to adapt to situational demands (Turner and Reynolds 2001; Turner et al. 2006).”
Intergroup structure and identity management among ethnic minority and majority groups: the interactive effects of perceived stability, legitimacy, and permeability (2008, background): “Furthermore, the particular identity management strategies also depend on the identity content and the ideological context (Turner, 1999; Turner & Reynolds, 2001).”