Can race be erased? Coalitional computation and social categorization
By Robert Kurzban, J. Tooby, L. Cosmides. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2001
832 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/269a312f68cb3987808834b38ba48f2ca0632be7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Mel Slater
- Jesse Graham
- Maria V. Sanchez-Vives
- Brian A. Nosek
- Jonathan Haidt
- Debra Lieberman
- Daniel M.T. Fessler
- Robert Kurzban
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Debra Lieberman
- Mel Slater
- C. David Navarrete
- N. Ambady
- Daniel M.T. Fessler
- J. Tooby
- L. Cosmides
- Jon K. Maner
In Sociology and Political Science
- Jesse Graham
- Bertram Gawronski
- Brian A. Nosek
- Jonathan Haidt
- Daniel M.T. Fessler
- Debra Lieberman
- Galen Bodenhausen
- Mark Schaller
Citations in the corpus
- Modularity in cognition: framing the debate. (2006, background): “Kurzban et al. (2001) suggested that because race was evolutionarily novel, it was unlikely that there would be evolved specialized machinery to categorize people along this dimension (see also Cosmides, Tooby, & Kurzban, 2003).”
- Manipulating subcategory salience: exploring the link between skin tone and social perception of Blacks (2004, background): “However, some evidence suggests that the accessibility of race can be decreased through experimental manipulations in this paradigm ( Kurzban, Tooby, & Cosmides, 2001; Stangor et al., 1992).”
- Resolving the debate on innate ideas: Learnability constraints and the evolved interpenetration of motivational and conceptual functions (2005, background): “…for the construction of representations of persons, predators (Barrett et al., under review), minds (Baron-Cohen, 1995; Leslie, 1987), coalitions (Kurzban et al., 2001; Price et al., 2002), social interactions (Cosmides & Tooby, 1989, 1992, 2005), kinship (Lieberman et al., 2003, in press, under…”
- The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents (2005, background): “…for the construction of representations of persons, predators (Barrett et al., under review), minds (Baron-Cohen, 1995; Leslie, 1987), coalitions (Kurzban et al., 2001; Price et al., 2002), social interactions (Cosmides & Tooby, 1989, 1992, 2005), kinship (Lieberman et al., 2003, in press, under…”
- The Effect of Social Category on Third Party Punishment (2007, background): “Humans possess cognitive adaptations to categorize individuals in the social world according to coalition or group membership (Kurzban, Tooby, and Cosmides, 2001) and such categorization has been found to occur with minimal prompting (Rabbie and Horwitz, 1969; Tajfel, Billig, Bundy, and Flament,…”
- On the epistemic costs of implicit bias (2011, background): “…classification that cuts across racial lines results in a facial recognition deficit that tracks the constructed in-group/out-group boundary, rather than the long-learned racial categories (Kurzban et al. 2001; cf. Ackerman et al. 2006; Cosmides et al. 2003; cf. Gaertner and Dovidio 2000).”
- The Nature of Race (2015, background): “This could be represented as a serendipitous “misfiring” of kin-favorit ism (Tooby and Cosmides, 1989; Kurzban et al. 2001) or as the result of group selection (Salter and Harpending, 2013).”
- Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. (2009, background): “Virtues of loyalty, patriotism, and self-sacrifice for the group, combined with an extreme vigilance for traitors, matched recent work on the evolution of “coalitional psychology” ( Kurzban, Tooby, & Cosmides, 2001 ).”
- Diversity in the person, diversity in the group: Challenges of identity complexity for social perception and social interaction (2009, background): “, people tend to form coalitions with racial ingroupmembers), but in the studies conducted by Kurzban et al., race and coalition status were experimentally unconfounded. Using the ‘‘who-said-what?’’ paradigm (Taylor, Fiske, Etcoff, & Ruderman, 1978) that has frequently been employed to examine spont”
- Putting yourself in the skin of a black avatar reduces implicit racial bias. (2013, background): “In Kurzban, Tooby, and Cosmides (2001) and Van Bavel and Cunningham (2009) it was shown that the formation of new in-group and out-groups based simply on pictures could lessen racial bias towards black members of the group.”